Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30111268›Full record

SynthesisInquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financing

Four Needles in a Haystack: A Systematic Review Assessing Quality of Health Care in Specialty Practice by Practice Type.

Shellie D Ellis, Saleema A Karim, Rachel R Vukas, Daniel Marx, Jalal Uddin

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Geographic differences in community oncology provider and practice location characteristics in the central United States.The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association · 2022
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Shellie D Ellis1 University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3599-0804
Saleema A Karim2 University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, USA.
Rachel R Vukas1 University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City, USA.
Daniel Marx3 Children's Mercy Hospital, Kansas City, MO, USA.
Jalal Uddin4 The University of Alabama at Birmingham, USA.

Funding

Mentored Training for Dissemination and Implemention Research in CancerR25CA171994 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI BROWNSON, ROSS C · 2013 to 2017
$1.5M
NCI NIH HHS R25 CA171994
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Specialists, who represent 60% of physicians in the United States, are consolidating into large group practices, but the degree to which group practice type facilitates the delivery of high quality of care in specialty settings is unknown. We conducted a systematic literature review to identify the impact of group practice type on the quality of care among specialty providers. The search resulted in 913 articles, of which only 4 met inclusion criteria. Studies were of moderate methodological quality. From the limited evidence available, we hypothesize that solo specialists deliver care that is inferior to their peers in group practice, whether measured by patient satisfaction ratings or adherence to guideline-based care. However, solo specialists and multidisciplinary group specialists may be more likely to provide some specialized services compared with their single-specialty group peers. Insufficient research compares quality of care among different practice types in specialty care. Substantial opportunity exists to test the degree to which organizational factors, whether size of practice or the mix of providers within the practice, influence quality of care in specialty settings.

Indexed as

HumansPatient SatisfactionPractice Patterns, Physicians'Quality of Health CareSpecializationgroup practicemultispecialtyprivate practicequality of health caresingle specialtysolo practicespecializationspecialtyspecialty care

Identifiers

PMID30111268
PMCPMC6432660

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.