Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30110460›Full record

ArticleRoyal Society open science2018

Jean Vannier, Cédric Aria, Rod S Taylor, Jean-Bernard Caron

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Royal Society open science, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Quantifying Evolutionary Dynamics of Arthropodization and Arthrodization.BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Cambrian euarthropodiScience · 2024
    Article
  8. The CambrianProceedings. Biological sciences · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. The problematic Cambrian arthropodRoyal Society open science · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Aquatic stem group myriapods close a gap between molecular divergence dates and the terrestrial fossil record.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jean VannierUniversité de Lyon, Université Lyon 1, ENS de Lyon, CNRS, UMR 5276 LGL-TPE, Bâtiment Géode, 2, rue Raphaël Dubois, Villeurbanne 69622, France.ORCID 0000-0003-0998-1231
Cédric AriaState Key Laboratory of Palaeobiology and Stratigraphy, Nanjing Institute of Geology and Palaeontology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 39, East Beijing Road, Nanjing 210008, People's Republic of China.
Rod S TaylorManuels River Hibernia Interpretation Centre, 7 Conception Bay South Highway, CBS, Newfoundland, Canada A1W 3A2.
Jean-Bernard CaronDepartment of Natural History (Palaeobiology Section), Royal Ontario Museum, 100 Queen's Park, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5S 2C6.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

arthropodaBurgess ShaleCambriancrustaceamandibulataWaptia

Identifiers

PMID30110460
PMCPMC6030330

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.