Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30110234›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2018

Activity of near-response cells during disconjugate saccades in strabismic monkeys.

Adam Pallus, Mark M G Walton, Michael Mustari

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Is Primate Lens Accommodation Unilaterally or Bilaterally Controlled?Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2020
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Visualizing Neuronal Adaptation Over Time After Treatment of Strabismus.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Adam PallusWashington National Primate Research Center, University of Washington , Seattle, Washington.
Mark M G WaltonWashington National Primate Research Center, University of Washington , Seattle, Washington.
Michael MustariWashington National Primate Research Center, University of Washington , Seattle, Washington.
University of Washington · US

Funding

Washington National Primate Research CenterP51OD010425 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Mari Ostendorf · 2012 to 2026
$201.8M
Vision Research CoreP30EY001730 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI JAMES Bryant HURLEY · 1985 to 2026
$23.5M
Brainstem Saccade Circuitry in StrabismusR01EY024248 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI WALTON, MARK M · 2015 to 2023
$4.2M
NEI NIH HHS P30 EY001730NEI NIH HHS R01 EY024248NIH HHS P51 OD010425
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Infantile strabismus is a common disorder characterized by a chronic misalignment of the eyes, impairment of binocular vision, and oculomotor abnormalities. Nonhuman primates with strabismus, induced in infancy, show a pattern of abnormalities similar to those of strabismic children. This allows strabismic nonhuman primates to serve as an ideal animal model to examine neural mechanisms associated with aberrant oculomotor behavior. Here, we test the hypothesis that impairment of disparity vergence and horizontal saccade disconjugacy in exotropia and esotropia are associated with disrupted tuning of near- and far-response neurons in the supraoculomotor area (SOA). In normal animals, these neurons carry signals related to vergence position and/or velocity. We hypothesized that, in strabismus, these neurons modulate inappropriately in association with saccades between equidistant targets. We recorded from 62 SOA neurons from 4 strabismic animals (2 esotropes and 2 exotropes) during visually guided saccades to a target that stepped to different locations on a tangent screen. Under these same conditions, SOA neurons in normal animals show no detectable modulation. In our strabismic subjects, we found that a subset of SOA neurons carry weak vergence velocity signals during saccades. In addition, a subset of SOA neurons showed clear modulation associated with slow fluctuations of horizontal strabismus angle in the absence of a saccade. We suggest that abnormal SOA activity contributes to fixation instability but plays only a minor role in the horizontal disconjugacy of saccades that do not switch fixation from one eye to the other. NEW & NOTEWORTHY The present study is the first to investigate the activity of neurons in the supraoculomotor area (SOA) during horizontally disconjugate saccades in a nonhuman primate model of infantile strabismus. We report that fluctuations of horizontal strabismus angle, during fixation of static targets on a tangent screen, are associated with contextually inappropriate modulation of SOA activity. However, firing rate modulation during saccades is too weak to make a major contribution to horizontal disconjugacy.

Indexed as

SaccadesAnimalsMacaca mulattaNeuronsOculomotor Nuclear ComplexStrabismusesotropiamonkeyneurophysiologystrabismusvergence

Identifiers

PMID30110234
PMCPMC6295545
OpenAlexW2887583130

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.