ReviewPhysiology (Bethesda, Md.)2018
Physiological Consequences of Coronary Arteriolar Dysfunction and Its Influence on Cardiovascular Disease.
Review in Physiology (Bethesda, Md.), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Maternal high-fat diet and risk of cardiovascular disease in offspring: a review of mechanisms, controversies, and interventions.Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.) · 2026Review
- The Relationship between Coronary Flow Reserve and the TyG Index in Patients with Gestational Diabetes Mellitus.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2023Article
- The ability of the geriatric nutritional risk index to predict the risk of heart diseases in Korean adults: a Korean Genome and Epidemiology Study cohort.Frontiers in nutrition · 2023Article
- Differential responses of resistance arterioles to elevated intraluminal pressure in blacks and whites.American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To date, the major focus of diagnostic modalities and interventions to treat coronary artery disease has been the large epicardial vessels. Despite substantial data showing that microcirculatory dysfunction is a strong predictor of future adverse cardiovascular events, very little research has gone into developing techniques for in vivo diagnosis and therapeutic interventions to improve microcirculatory function. In this review, we will discuss the pathophysiology of coronary arteriolar dysfunction, define its prognostic implications, evaluate the diagnostic modalities available, and provide speculation on current and potential therapeutic opportunities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.