Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30109483›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of urology2019

ICUD-SIU International Consultation on Bladder Cancer 2017: management of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer.

Leonardo L Monteiro, J Alfred Witjes, Piyush K Agarwal, Christopher B Anderson, Trinity J Bivalacqua, Bernard H Bochner, Joost L Boormans, Sam S Chang, Jose L Domínguez-Escrig, James M McKiernan and 12 more

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of urology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. The Use of UrineEuropean urology open science · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 18 institutions in 6 countries.

Leonardo L MonteiroDivision of Urology, McGill University Health Center-Glen Site, 1001 Decarie Blvd, Montreal, QC, H3A 3J1, Canada.
J Alfred WitjesDepartment of Urology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Piyush K AgarwalUrologic Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Christopher B AndersonDepartment of Urology, Columbia University, New York, USA.
Trinity J BivalacquaThe James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Bernard H BochnerUrology Service, Department of Surgery, Kimmel Center for Prostate and Urologic Cancers, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA.
Joost L BoormansDepartment of Urology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Sam S ChangIngram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University, Tennessee, USA.
Jose L Domínguez-EscrigDepartment of Urology, Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, Valencia, Spain.
James M McKiernanDepartment of Urology, Columbia University, New York, USA.
Colin DinneyDepartment of Urology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA.
Guilherme GodoyScott Department of Urology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, USA.
Girish S KulkarniDivision of Urology, Department of Surgery and Surgical Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Paramananthan MariappanDepartment of Urology, Western General Hospital, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Michael A O'DonnellUniversity of Iowa, Iowa City, USA.
Cyrill A RentschDepartment of Urology, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Jay B ShahDepartment of Urology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, USA.
Eduardo SolsonaDepartment of Urology, Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, Valencia, Spain.
Robert S SvatekDepartment of Urology, Division of Urologic Oncology, The University of Texas Health San Antonio, San Antonio, USA.
Antoine G van der HeijdenDepartment of Urology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
F Johannes P van ValenbergDepartment of Urology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Wassim KassoufDivision of Urology, McGill University Health Center-Glen Site, 1001 Decarie Blvd, Montreal, QC, H3A 3J1, Canada. wassim.kassouf@muhc.mcgill.ca.
Columbia University · USFundación Instituto Valenciano de Oncología · ESMcGill University Health Centre · CARadboud University Nijmegen · NLBaylor College of Medicine · USErasmus MC Cancer Institute · NLJohns Hopkins Medicine · USMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USNational Cancer Institute · USRadboud University Medical Center · NLStanford University · USThe University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio · USThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USUniversity of Basel · CHUniversity of Edinburgh · GBUniversity of Iowa · USUniversity of Toronto · CAVanderbilt University · US

Funding

Viral VectorP30CA086862 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI Mark E Burkard · 2000 to 2026
$70.0M
Molecular Targeted Photoimmunotherapy for Bladder CancerZIABC011458 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI AGARWAL, PIYUSH · 2012 to 2019
$3.5M
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo provide a summary of the Third International Consultation on Bladder Cancer recommendations for the management of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC).

methodsA detailed review of the literature was performed focusing on original articles for the management of NMIBC. An international committee assessed and graded the articles based on the Oxford Centre for Evidence-based Medicine system. The entire spectrum of NMIBC was covered such as prognostic factors of recurrence and progression, risk stratification, staging, management of positive urine cytology with negative white light cystoscopy, indications of bladder and prostatic urethral biopsies, management of Ta low grade (LG) and high risk tumors (Ta high grade [HG], T1, carcinoma in situ [CIS]), impact of BCG strain and host on outcomes, management of complications of intravesical therapy, role of alternative therapies, indications for early cystectomy, surveillance strategies, and new treatments. The working group provides several recommendations on the management of NMIBC.

resultsRecommendations were summarized with regard to staging; management of primary and recurrent LG Ta and high risk disease, positive urine cytology with negative white light cystoscopy and prostatic urethral involvement; indications for timely cystectomy; and surveillance strategies.

conclusionNMIBC remains a common and challenging malignancy to manage. Accurate staging, grading, and risk stratification are critical determinants of the management and outcomes of these patients. Current tools for risk stratification are limited but informative, and should be used in clinical practice when determining diagnosis, surveillance, and treatment of NMIBC.

Indexed as

Adjuvants, ImmunologicAdministration, IntravesicalBCG VaccineCarcinoma in SituCarcinoma, Transitional CellCystectomyCystoscopyDisease ProgressionHumansMaleNeoplasm GradingNeoplasm InvasivenessNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNeoplasm StagingPrognosisProstateAdjuvants, ImmunologicBCG VaccineBacillus Calmette–GuerinBladder cancerDiagnosisGuidelinesICUDNon-muscle invasive bladder cancerStagingSurveillanceTransurethral resection of bladder tumorTreatment

Identifiers

PMID30109483
OpenAlexW2887103583

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.