ArticleStrahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al]2018
Unilateral cochlea sparing in locoregionally advanced head and neck cancer: a planning study.
Article in Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al], 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Cochlea sparing optimized radiotherapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma.Radiation oncology (London, England) · 2021Article
- A Dosimetric Comparison of Volumetric-modulated Arc Therapy and IMRT for Cochlea-sparing Radiation Therapy in Locally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Cancer.Journal of medical physicsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCochlea sparing can reduce late ototoxicity in head and neck cancer patients treated with cisplatin-based radiochemotherapy. In this situation, a mean cochlear dose (MCD) constraint of 10 Gy has been suggested by others based on the dose-effect relationship of clinical data. We aimed to investigate whether this is feasible for primary and postoperative radiochemotherapy in locoregionally advanced tumors without compromising target coverage. PATIENTS AND
methodsTen patients treated with definitive and ten patients treated with adjuvant intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and concurrent chemotherapy were investigated. The cochleae and a planning risk volume (PRV) with a 3 mm margin were newly delineated, whereas target volumes and other organs at risk were not changed. The initial plan was recalculated with a constraint of 10 Gy (MCD) on the low-risk side. The quality of the resulting plan was evaluated using the difference in the equivalent uniform dose (EUD).
resultsA unilateral MCD of below 10 Gy could be achieved in every patient. The mean MCD was 6.8 Gy in the adjuvant cohort and 7.6 Gy in the definitive cohort, while the non-spared side showed a mean MCD of 18.7 and 30.3 Gy, respectively. The mean PRV doses were 7.8 and 8.4 Gy for the spared side and 18.5 and 29.8 Gy for the non-spared side, respectively. The mean EUD values of the initial and recalculated plans were identical. Target volume was not compromised.
conclusionUnilateral cochlea sparing with an MCD of less than 10 Gy is feasible without compromising the target volume or dose coverage in locoregionally advanced head and neck cancer patients treated with IMRT. A prospective evaluation of the clinical benefit of this approach as well as further investigation of the dose-response relationship for future treatment modification appears promising.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.