Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30109145›Full record

ArticleNPJ vaccines2018

Selection and evaluation of an efficient method for the recovery of viral nucleic acids from complex biologicals [corrected].

Sarmitha Sathiamoorthy, Rebecca J Malott, Lucy Gisonni-Lex, Siemon H S Ng

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ vaccines, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Comprehensive Review on Viral RNA Extraction Strategies for Enhanced Molecular Diagnostics.Interdisciplinary perspectives on infectious diseases · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Revolutionized virome research using systems microbiology approaches.Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.) · 2022
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Nucleic Acid Testing of SARS-CoV-2.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sarmitha SathiamoorthyMicrobiology & Virology Platform, Department of Analytical Research & Development North America, Sanofi Pasteur, Toronto, ON Canada.
Rebecca J MalottMicrobiology & Virology Platform, Department of Analytical Research & Development North America, Sanofi Pasteur, Toronto, ON Canada.
Lucy Gisonni-LexMicrobiology & Virology Platform, Department of Analytical Research & Development North America, Sanofi Pasteur, Toronto, ON Canada.
Siemon H S NgMicrobiology & Virology Platform, Department of Analytical Research & Development North America, Sanofi Pasteur, Toronto, ON Canada.
Sanofi (Canada) · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is a need for a broad and efficient testing strategy for the detection of both known and novel viral adventitious agents in vaccines and biologicals. High-throughput sequencing (HTS) is an approach for such testing; however, an optimized testing method is one with a sample-processing pipeline that can help detect any viral adventitious agent that may be present. In this study, 11 commercial methods were assessed for efficient extraction of nucleic acids from a panel of viruses. An extraction strategy with two parallel arms, consisting of both the Invitrogen PureLink™ Virus RNA/DNA kit for total nucleic acid extraction and the Wako DNA Extractor

Identifiers

PMID30109145
PMCPMC6086827
OpenAlexW2809649622

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.