Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30109130›Full record

ArticleNeuroscience of consciousness2016

The temporal advantage for reloading vs. uploading conscious representations decays over time.

Hsin-Mei Sun, Marina Inyutina, Rufin VanRullen, Chien-Te Wu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuroscience of consciousness, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 91% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Hsin-Mei SunSchool of Occupational Therapy, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Marina InyutinaUniversité de Toulouse, CerCo, Université Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France.
Rufin VanRullenUniversité de Toulouse, CerCo, Université Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France.
Chien-Te WuSchool of Occupational Therapy, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRHôpital Purpan · FRNational Taiwan University · TWNational Taiwan University Hospital · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In motion-induced blindness (MIB), a static target superimposed on a global moving pattern frequently disappears and reappears into consciousness. We previously reported an intriguing illusory temporal reversal whereby a new stimulus onset (e.g. a dot flash) presented during MIB triggers an early reappearance of the target, yet is systematically perceived as occurring after the target reappearance. This illusion implies that the unconscious target representation can be quickly reactivated, with a temporal advantage for its conscious reloading as compared to the conscious uploading of a newly presented visual stimulus. However, it remains unclear whether the temporal advantage for conscious representation reloading strengthens, decays, or remains constant over time after we lose the initial conscious access to the stimulus. To address this question, we examined the relation between the duration of MIB and the percentage of illusory temporal reversals, and we found a negative correlation between the two measures, both between and within observers. The results suggest that although the unconscious target representation retains a certain level of activation during MIB, the temporal advantage for reloading its preexisting representation into consciousness decays over time.

Indexed as

illusory temporal reversalmotion-induced blindness (MIB)unconscious object representationvisual awareness

Identifiers

PMID30109130
PMCPMC6084582
OpenAlexW2523317111

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.