Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30109017›Full record

ArticleF1000Research

Best practice data life cycle approaches for the life sciences.

Philippa C Griffin, Jyoti Khadake, Kate S LeMay, Suzanna E Lewis, Sandra Orchard, Andrew Pask, Bernard Pope, Ute Roessner, Keith Russell, Torsten Seemann and 17 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in F1000Research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

27 authors.

Philippa C GriffinEMBL Australia Bioinformatics Resource, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, 3010, Australia.
Jyoti KhadakeNIHR BioResource, University of Cambridge and Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust Hills Road, Cambridge , CB2 0QQ, UK.
Kate S LeMayAustralian National Data Service, Monash University, Malvern East , VIC, 3145, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2405-7365
Suzanna E LewisLawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Environmental Genomics and Systems Biology Division, Berkeley, CA, 94720, USA.
Sandra OrchardEuropean Bioinformatics Institute (EMBL-EBI), European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Cambridge, CB10 1SD, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8878-3972
Andrew PaskSchool of BioSciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, 3010, Australia.
Bernard PopeMelbourne Bioinformatics, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, 3010, Australia.
Ute RoessnerMetabolomics Australia, School of BioSciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, 3010, Australia.
Keith RussellAustralian National Data Service, Monash University, Malvern East , VIC, 3145, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5390-2719
Torsten SeemannMelbourne Bioinformatics, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, 3010, Australia.
Andrew TreloarAustralian National Data Service, Monash University, Malvern East , VIC, 3145, Australia.
Sonika TyagiAustralian Genome Research Facility Ltd, Parkville, VIC, 3052, Australia.
Jeffrey H ChristiansenQueensland Cyber Infrastructure Foundation and the University of Queensland Research Computing Centre, St Lucia, QLD, 4072, Australia.
Saravanan DayalanMetabolomics Australia, School of BioSciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, 3010, Australia.
Simon GladmanEMBL Australia Bioinformatics Resource, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, 3010, Australia.
Sandra B HangartnerSchool of Biological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, 3800, Australia.
Helen L HaydenAgriculture Victoria, AgriBio, Centre for AgriBioscience, Department of Economic Development, Jobs, Transport and Resources (DEDJTR), Bundoora, VIC, 3083, Australia.
William W H HoSchool of BioSciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, 3010, Australia.
Gabriel Keeble-GagnèreSchool of BioSciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, 3010, Australia.
Pasi K KorhonenFaculty of Veterinary and Agricultural Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, 3010, Australia.
Peter NeishThe University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, 3010, Australia.
Priscilla R PrestesFaculty of Science and Engineering, Federation University Australia, Mt Helen , VIC, 3350, Australia.
Mark F RichardsonBioinformatics Core Research Group & Centre for Integrative Ecology, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, 3220, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1650-0064
Nathan S Watson-HaighSchool of Agriculture, Food and Wine, University of Adelaide, Glen Osmond, SA, 5064, Australia.
Kelly L WyresDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Bio21 Molecular Science and Biotechnology Institute, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, 3010, Australia.
Neil D YoungFaculty of Veterinary and Agricultural Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, 3010, Australia.
Maria Victoria SchneiderMelbourne Bioinformatics, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, 3010, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Throughout history, the life sciences have been revolutionised by technological advances; in our era this is manifested by advances in instrumentation for data generation, and consequently researchers now routinely handle large amounts of heterogeneous data in digital formats. The simultaneous transitions towards biology as a data science and towards a 'life cycle' view of research data pose new challenges. Researchers face a bewildering landscape of data management requirements, recommendations and regulations, without necessarily being able to access data management training or possessing a clear understanding of practical approaches that can assist in data management in their particular research domain. Here we provide an overview of best practice data life cycle approaches for researchers in the life sciences/bioinformatics space with a particular focus on 'omics' datasets and computer-based data processing and analysis. We discuss the different stages of the data life cycle and provide practical suggestions for useful tools and resources to improve data management practices.

Indexed as

bioinformaticsdata managementdata sharingopen sciencereproducibility

Identifiers

PMID30109017
PMCPMC6069748

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.