ArticleCurrent zoology2018
Evaluation and hedonic value in mate choice.
Article in Current zoology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Selection drives divergence of eye morphology in sympatric Heliconius butterflies.Evolution; international journal of organic evolution · 2024Article
- The Sensory Ecology of Speciation.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2024Review
- Article
- When less is more: coy display behaviours and the temporal dynamics of animal courtship.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2023Review
- A modular circuit architecture coordinates the diversification of courtship strategies inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
- Star finches Neochmia ruficauda have a visual preference for white dot patterns: a possible case of trypophilia.Animal cognition · 2022Article
- Positive-to-negative behavioural responses suggest hedonic evaluation in treefrog mate choice.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2022Article
- Large-scale characterization of sex pheromone communication systems in Drosophila.Nature communications · 2021Article
- Darwin, sexual selection, and the brain.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021Article
- Processing bias: extending sensory drive to include efficacy and efficiency in information processing.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2019Review
- Sexual selection, phenotypic plasticity and female reproductive output.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2019Review
- A perspective on sensory drive.Current zoology · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mating preferences can show extreme variation within and among individuals even when sensory inputs are conserved. This variation is a result of changes associated with evaluative mechanisms that assign positive, neutral, or negative hedonic value to stimuli-that is, label them as attractive, uninteresting, or unattractive. There is widespread behavioral evidence for differences in genes, environmental cues, or social experience leading to marked changes in the hedonic value of stimuli. Evaluation is accomplished through an array of mechanisms that are readily modifiable through genetic changes or environmental inputs, and that may often result in the rapid acquisition or loss of behavioral preferences. Reversals in preference arising from "flips" in hedonic value may be quite common. Incorporating such discontinuous changes into models of preference evolution may illuminate our understanding of processes like trait diversification, sexual conflict, and sympatric speciation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.