Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30108580›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2018

Plant and Microbial Responses to Repeated Cu(OH)

Marie Simonin, Benjamin P Colman, Weiyi Tang, Jonathan D Judy, Steven M Anderson, Christina M Bergemann, Jennifer D Rocca, Jason M Unrine, Nicolas Cassar, Emily S Bernhardt

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 67 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Estimation of health risks due to copper-based nanoagrochemicals.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2022
    Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Marie SimoninCenter for the Environmental Implications of Nanotechnology, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States.
Benjamin P ColmanCenter for the Environmental Implications of Nanotechnology, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States.
Weiyi TangDivision of Earth and Ocean Sciences, Nicholas School of the Environment, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States.
Jonathan D JudySoil and Water Sciences Department, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.
Steven M AndersonCenter for the Environmental Implications of Nanotechnology, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States.
Christina M BergemannCenter for the Environmental Implications of Nanotechnology, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States.
Jennifer D RoccaDepartment of Biology, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States.
Jason M UnrineDepartment of Plant and Soil Sciences, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, United States.
Nicolas CassarDivision of Earth and Ocean Sciences, Nicholas School of the Environment, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States.
Emily S BernhardtCenter for the Environmental Implications of Nanotechnology, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States.
Duke University · USUniversity of Florida · USUniversity of Kentucky · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The environmental fate and potential impacts of nanopesticides on agroecosystems under realistic agricultural conditions are poorly understood. As a result, the benefits and risks of these novel formulations compared to the conventional products are currently unclear. Here, we examined the effects of repeated realistic exposures of the Cu(OH)

Indexed as

copper hydroxidefungicidemicrobial extracellular enzyme activitiesmycorrhizal colonizationnanomaterialsnitrogen fixationpastureterrestrial mesocosms

Identifiers

PMID30108580
PMCPMC6079317
OpenAlexW2886207929

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.