Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30108533›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2018

Is Parent-Child Disagreement on Child Anxiety Explained by Differences in Measurement Properties? An Examination of Measurement Invariance Across Informants and Time.

Thomas M Olino, Megan Finsaas, Lea R Dougherty, Daniel N Klein

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Clinical Applications of Measurement Invariance.Journal of personality assessment
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Thomas M OlinoDepartment of Psychology, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
Megan FinsaasDepartment of Psychology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, United States.
Lea R DoughertyDepartment of Psychology, University of Maryland College Park, College Park, MD, United States.
Daniel N KleinDepartment of Psychology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, United States.

Funding

Temperamental Low PE in Preschoolers and Depression RiskR01MH069942 · NIMH · STATE UNIVERSITY NEW YORK STONY BROOK · PI KLEIN, DANIEL N · 2004 to 2023
$14.2M
Developmental changes in reward responsivity: Associations with depression risk markersR01MH107495 · NIMH · TEMPLE UNIV OF THE COMMONWEALTH · PI OLINO, THOMAS M · 2016 to 2020
$3.6M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH069942NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH107495
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There are numerous empirical studies demonstrating that agreement between parent-reports of youth and youth self-reports of internalizing behavior problems is modest at best. This has spurred much research on factors that influence the magnitude of associations between informants, including individual difference characteristics of the informants and contexts through which individuals interact with the child. There is also tremendous interest in understanding symptom trajectories longitudinally. However, each of these lines of work are predicated on the assumptions that the psychometric construct that is being assessed from each informant and at each measurement occasion is the same. This study examined measurement invariance between maternal and child reports and longitudinally across ages 9 and 12 on five dimensions of anxiety using the Screen for Child Anxiety and Related Disorders (SCARED; Birmaher et al., 1999). No cross-informant models for anxiety dimensions achieved acceptable fit and at least partial metric and scalar invariance. Moreover, few longitudinal models demonstrated acceptable fit and at least partial metric and scalar invariance. Thus, using the SCARED as an example, these results show that inter-informant agreement may be compromised by different item functioning, and highlight the need for testing invariance before using measures for longitudinal tracking of symptoms.

Indexed as

anxietyassessmentdevelopmentmeasurement invarianceparent–child agreement

Identifiers

PMID30108533
PMCPMC6079214

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.