Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30108479›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2018

Repeated Bout Rate Enhancement Is Elicited by Various Forms of Finger Tapping.

Anders Emanuelsen, Michael Voigt, Pascal Madeleine, Pia Kjær, Sebastian Dam, Nikolaj Koefoed, Ernst A Hansen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Anders EmanuelsenSport Sciences, Department of Health Science and Technology, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.
Michael VoigtSport Sciences, Department of Health Science and Technology, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.
Pascal MadeleineSport Sciences, Department of Health Science and Technology, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.
Pia KjærSport Sciences, Department of Health Science and Technology, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.
Sebastian DamSport Sciences, Department of Health Science and Technology, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.
Nikolaj KoefoedSport Sciences, Department of Health Science and Technology, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.
Ernst A HansenSport Sciences, Department of Health Science and Technology, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.
Aalborg University · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Voluntary rhythmic movements, such as, for example, locomotion and other cyclic tasks, are fundamental during everyday life. Patients with impaired neural or motor function often take part in rehabilitation programs, which include rhythmic movements. Therefore, it is imperative to have the best possible understanding of control and behaviour of human voluntary rhythmic movements. A behavioural phenomenon termed repeated bout rate enhancement has been established as an increase of the freely chosen index finger tapping frequency during the second of two consecutive tapping bouts. The present study investigated whether the phenomenon would be elicited when the first bout consisted of imposed passive finger tapping or air tapping. These two forms of tapping were applied since they can be performed without descending drive (passive tapping) and without afferent feedback related to impact (air tapping) - as compared to tapping on a surface. Healthy individuals (

Indexed as

finger tapping ratemodulatory effectsmovement controlmovement ratevoluntary movement behaviour

Identifiers

PMID30108479
PMCPMC6079229
OpenAlexW2885984503

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.