ArticleSaudi journal of biological sciences2018
Integrative computational evaluation of genetic markers for Alzheimer's disease.
Article in Saudi journal of biological sciences, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Proteomics of brain, CSF, and plasma identifies molecular signatures for distinguishing sporadic and genetic Alzheimer's disease.Science translational medicine · 2023Article
- Exploration of novel biomarkers in Alzheimer's disease based on four diagnostic models.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2023Article
- Case report of first-episode psychotic symptoms in a patient with early-onset Alzheimer's disease.BMC psychiatry · 2020Article
- Differential Expression of mRNAs in the Brain Tissues of Patients with Alzheimer's Disease Based on GEO Expression Profile and Its Clinical Significance.BioMed research international · 2019Article
- Identification of Hub Genes Related to Alzheimer's Disease and Major Depressive Disorder.American journal of Alzheimer's disease and other dementiasArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recent studies have reported hundreds of genes linked to Alzheimer's Disease (AD). However, many of these candidate genes may be not identified in different studies when analyses were replicated. Moreover, results could be controversial. Here, we proposed a computational workflow to curate and evaluate AD related genes. The method integrates large scale literature knowledge data and gene expression data that were acquired from postmortem human brain regions (AD case/control: 31/32 and 22/8). Pathway Enrichment, Sub-Network Enrichment, and Gene-Gene Interaction analysis were conducted to study the pathogenic profile of the candidate genes, with 4 metrics proposed and validated for each gene. By using our approach, a scalable AD genetic database was developed, including AD related genes, pathways, diseases and info of supporting references. The AD case/control classification supported the effectiveness of the 4 proposed metrics, which successfully identified 21 well-studied AD genes (i.g. TGFB1, CTNNB1, APP, IL1B, PSEN1, PTGS2, IL6, VEGFA, SOD1, AKT1, CDK5, TNF, GSK3B, TP53, CCL2, BDNF, NGF, IGF1, SIRT1, AGER and TLR) and highlighted one recently reported AD gene (i.g. ITGB1). The computational biology approach and the AD database developed in this study provide a valuable resource which may facilitate the understanding of the AD genetic profile.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.