ArticleBioinformation2018
Comparative evaluation of anti-angiogenic effects of noscapine derivatives.
Article in Bioinformation, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- ZnO@PDA@Ag nanocomposite-mediated delivery of 9-bromonoscapine, an anticancer agent, for enhanced lung cancer therapy.Nanoscale advances · 2026Article
- Noscapine-bile acid hybrids as novel anticancer agents.RSC medicinal chemistry · 2025Article
- Molecular modeling and simulations of some antiviral drugs, benzylisoquinoline alkaloid, and coumarin molecules to investigate the effects on Mpro main viral protease inhibition.Biochemistry and biophysics reports · 2023Article
- Integration of phytotherapy and chemotherapy: Recent advances in anticancer molecular pathways.Iranian journal of basic medical sciences · 2023Review
- Natural Products: A Promising Therapeutics for Targeting Tumor Angiogenesis.Frontiers in oncology · 2021Review
- Noscapine, an Emerging Medication for Different Diseases: A Mechanistic Review.Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2021Review
- A review of research progress of antitumor drugs based on tubulin targets.Translational cancer research · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Angiogenesis, the formation of new capillaries from pre-existing vessels, is essential for tumor progression. Synthetic derivatives of anti-cancer compound, noscapine (an opium alkaloid) such as Cl-noscapine, Br-noscapine and Folate-noscapine along with two of the reference compounds, TNP-470 and paclitaxel were examined for anti-angiogenic activities by using human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs). The noscapine derivatives showed anti-angiogenic activity albeit at high concentration compared to the reference compounds. All the tested compounds inhibited angiogenesis in a dose-dependent manner; the drug concentration causing 50% inhibition of cell survival was 11.87 μM for Cl-noscapine, 6.9 μM for Br-noscapine and 6.79 μM for folate-noscapine. Besides, all the noscapine derivatives significantly inhibited cord formation (IC50 for Cl-noscapine is 50.76 μM, for Br-noscapine is 90.08 μM and for folate-noscapine is 18.44 μM) as well as migration and invasion (IC50 value of Cl-noscapine is 28.01 μM, for Br-noscapine is 19.78 μM and for folate-noscapine is 10.76 μM) of endothelial cells. Based on these results, we speculated that the inhibitory effects on human endothelial cell proliferation of noscapine derivatives might be important for anti-angiogenesis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.