ArticleProstate cancer and prostatic diseases2019
Prostate cancer risk factors in black and white men in the NIH-AARP Diet and Health Study.
Article in Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Consumption of red meat and processed meat and cancer incidence: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies.European journal of epidemiology · 2021Pooled it
- Trends in the incidence of cancers of the male genital system and urinary bladder in Harare, Zimbabwe, 1990-2019.Cancer causes & control : CCC · 2025Article
- Vitamin D-related genetic variants and prostate cancer risk in Black men.Cancer epidemiology · 2025Article
- Burden of prostate cancer in the Middle East: A comparative analysis based on global cancer observatory data.Cancer medicine · 2023Article
- Reliability of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients with a Previous Negative Biopsy: Comparison with Biopsy-Naïve Patients in the Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- A 28-year prospective analysis of serum vitamin E, vitamin E-related genetic variation and risk of prostate cancer.Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases · 2022Article
- Precision intervention for prostate cancer: Re-evaluating who is at risk.Cancer letters · 2022Review
- Population-Level Patterns of Prostate Cancer Occurrence: Disparities in Virginia.Current molecular biology reports · 2022Article
- Developing a Multimodal Model for Detecting Higher-Grade Prostate Cancer Using Biomarkers and Risk Factors.BioMed research international · 2022Article
- Article
- The Problem of Underrepresentation: Black Participants in Lifestyle Trials Among Patients with Prostate Cancer.Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities · 2020Article
- A Pilot Study on the Whole Exome Sequencing of Prostate Cancer in the Indian Phenotype Reveals Distinct Polymorphisms.Frontiers in genetics · 2020Article
- Gender Differences in Binge Drinking: Prevalence, Predictors, and ConsequencesAlcohol research : current reviews · 2018Review
- Comparative Study of Gleason 7 (3+4) and (4+3) Prostatic Adenocarcinomas with Prognostic Criteria and Immunohistochemical Profiles of AMACR, PSA and Ki-67.International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of UrologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThere are few prospective studies comparing race-specific associations between diet, nutrients, and health-related parameters, and prostate cancer risk.
methodsRace-specific prostate cancer risk associations were examined among men in the National Institutes of Health (NIH)-AARP Diet and Health Study. We identified 1417 cases among black men (209 advanced), and 28,845 among white men (3898 advanced). Cox proportional hazards regression models estimated hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). We also evaluated the cumulative change in the HR for black race following adjustment for each factor.
resultsRace-specific prostate cancer associations were similar in black and white men across disease subtypes only for history of diabetes (overall : HR = 0.77, 95% CI: 0.65-0.90 and HR = 0.72, 95% CI: 0.69-0.76, respectively; P
conclusionsOur data suggest few of the dietary, nutrient, and health-related factors associated with prostate cancer risk in predominantly non-Hispanic white men were associated with risk in black men, and adjustment for these factors widen the black-white difference in risk. Larger studies of black men, particularly with prospective data, are needed to help identify risk factors relevant to this population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.