ArticleJournal of human hypertension2018
Diagnosing orthostatic hypotension with continuous and interval blood pressure measurement devices.
Article in Journal of human hypertension, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence driven clustering of blood pressure profiles reveals frailty in orthostatic hypertension.Experimental physiology · 2025Article
- Autonomic dysfunction in post-COVID patients with and witfhout neurological symptoms: a prospective multidomain observational study.Journal of neurology · 2022Observational
- Orthostatic Intolerance in Adults Reporting Long COVID Symptoms Was Not Associated With Postural Orthostatic Tachycardia Syndrome.Frontiers in physiology · 2022Article
- Orthostatic blood pressure changes and physical, functional and cognitive performance: the MELoR study.Clinical autonomic research : official journal of the Clinical Autonomic Research Society · 2020Observational
- Interrelationships between pulse arrival time and arterial blood pressure during postural transitions before and after spaceflight.Journal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985) · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Orthostatic hypotension (OH) is defined as a drop in systolic blood pressure (SBP) of ≥20 mm Hg and/or a drop in diastolic blood pressure (DBP) of ≥10 mm Hg within 3 min of standing. The international guidelines recommend ideally diagnosing OH with a continuous blood pressure (BP) measurement device, although in daily practice interval BP measurement devices are used more often. We aimed to investigate the difference in observed prevalence of OH between an interval and a continuous BP measurement device. A total of 104 patients with a mean age of 69 years were included. The prevalence of OH was 35.6% (95% CI: 26.4-44.8) with the interval BP measurement and 45.2% (95% CI: 35.6-54.8) with the continuous BP measurement device (P = .121). Lin's coefficient of concordance ranged from 0.47 to 0.59 for the drop in systolic blood pressure and from 0.33 to 0.42 for the drop in diastolic blood pressure. The positive proportion of agreement in diagnosis of OH between the interval and continuous measure was 59.5% and the negative proportion of agreement was 72.5%. Although the prevalence of OH was not significantly different between the continuous and the interval BP measurement devices using a similar amount of measurement, the concordance between interval and continuous measure is low resulting in low positive and negative proportions of agreement in the diagnosis of OH. We conclude that continuous BP measurement cannot be substituted by an interval BP measurement to diagnose OH.
Indexed as
Identifiers
30108291What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.