Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30108281›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of clinical nutrition2019

EXploring practice gaps to improve PERIoperativE Nutrition CarE (EXPERIENCE Study): a qualitative analysis of barriers to implementation of evidence-based practice guidelines.

Angela Byrnes, Adrienne Young, Alison Mudge, Merrilyn Banks, Judy Bauer

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of clinical nutrition, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Use of the i-PARIHS framework in nutrition and dietetics research and practice: A citation analysis of the literature and case studies.Nutrition in clinical practice : official publication of the American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition · 2025
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion within Pediatric Adherence Science.Journal of clinical psychology in medical settings · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Fasting and surgery timing (FaST) audit.Clinical nutrition (Edinburgh, Scotland) · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Angela ByrnesSchool of Human Movement and Nutrition Sciences, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, 4072, Australia. a.byrnes@uq.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4069-4724
Adrienne YoungNutrition and Dietetics, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston, QLD, 4006, Australia.
Alison MudgeInternal Medicine and Aged Care, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston, QLD, 4006, Australia.
Merrilyn BanksNutrition and Dietetics, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston, QLD, 4006, Australia.
Judy BauerSchool of Human Movement and Nutrition Sciences, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, 4072, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

objectivesAligning care with best practice-such as Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) guidelines-may improve patient outcomes. However, translating research into practice is challenging and implementation science literature emphasises the importance of understanding barriers and enablers specific to the local context and clinicians. This study aimed to explore staff perceptions about barriers and enablers to practice change aligning with nutrition-related recommendations from ERAS guidelines. SUBJECTS/

methodsA qualitative study using a maximum variation sampling method. Clinicians involved in care of patients admitted to two general surgical wards consented to participate in semi-structured interviews. Framework analysis was undertaken using the integrated Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services framework to identify a priori and emergent themes.

resultsFrom interviews with 13 clinicians (two surgical consultants, one registrar, one intern; one anaesthetist; two nurse unit managers, one surgical nurse coordinator, three nurses; two dietitians), three major themes were identified: (a) complexity of the context (e.g., unpredictable theatre times, requirement for flexibility and large, multidisciplinary workforce); (b) strong decision-making hierarchy, combined with lack of knowledge, confidence or authority of junior and non-surgical staff to implement change; and (c) poor communication and teamwork (within and between disciplines). These barriers culminate in practice where default behaviours are habit, and the view that achieving clinical consensus is challenging.

conclusionsThis study highlights the necessity for a multifaceted implementation approach that simplifies the process, flattens the power differential and facilitates communication and teamwork. Other facilities may consider these findings when implementing similar practice change interventions.

Indexed as

Professional Practice GapsAdultClinical Decision-MakingCommunicationEvidence-Based PracticeFemaleGuideline AdherenceHealth PersonnelHealth Plan ImplementationHumansMaleMiddle AgedNutrition TherapyPerioperative CarePractice Guidelines as TopicQualitative Research

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.