ArticleCanadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien2018
Low-acuity presentations to the emergency department: Reasons for and access to other health care providers before presentation.
Article in Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Pooled it
- Examining emergency department utilisation in people with Crystal Arthropathies: a 10-year analysis of visits in a publicly funded universal healthcare system.EULAR rheumatology open · 2026Article
- Factors influencing emergency department utilisation using Andersen's behavioural model: a cross-sectional study in a public hospital in Malaysia.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- A Qualitative Examination of Job Satisfaction in Emergency Medicine From the Perspective of Physicians Also Working in Prehospital and Retrieval Medicine.Emergency medicine Australasia : EMA · 2025Article
- Does Calm Always Follow the Storm? A Comprehensive Temporal Analysis of Emergency Department Visits in Northern Italy Before and After the COVID-19 Pandemic.Epidemiologia (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Behavioral Determinants of Hospital Selection in Urological Care: Evidence From China's Hierarchical Healthcare System.Risk management and healthcare policy · 2025Article
- Workload and patterns of care in the Timmins Family Health Team in Ontario.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2021Article
- Article
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo describe the demographic characteristics of patients who present to the emergency department (ED) for low-acuity issues and to explore their self-reported contact with other sources of primary health care before presenting to the ED.
designSurvey distributed in the ED waiting room.
settingA high-volume ED in Vancouver, BC.
participantsA total of 232 respondents aged 18 years or older in the ED waiting room.
main outcome measuresActions taken to seek health care for the current issue before presenting to the ED and predictors of first seeking nonurgent care.
resultsOf the 398 people approached, 232 (58.3%) people completed the survey. Exactly half (95% CI 43.6% to 56.4%) sought alternative care before presenting to the ED. Predictors for having sought alternative care included illness presentation and longer symptom duration, while injury presentation and work-related presentation were associated with not seeking alternative care. Most participants (162 patients, 87.6%) believed that the ED was the most appropriate place for them to receive care for their problem, while only 87 (45.3%) believed that an adjacent primary care clinic would be an acceptable alternative.
conclusionMany patients do attempt to seek alternative care before presenting to the ED with low acuity issues. Most patients believe that the ED is the best place for them to receive care and are uncertain about using a primary care alternative. Further research is needed to explore barriers and motivators patients face in their decisions to seek care, as well as potential patient education methods to improve appropriate ED use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
30108090PMC6189897What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.