Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30108090›Full record

ArticleCanadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien2018

Low-acuity presentations to the emergency department: Reasons for and access to other health care providers before presentation.

Kimberley Sancton, Leila Sloss, Jonathan Berkowitz, Nardia Strydom, Rita McCracken

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Workload and patterns of care in the Timmins Family Health Team in Ontario.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kimberley SanctonFamily physician practising in Chisasibi, Que, and Clinical Faculty Lecturer in the Department of Family Medicine at McGill University in Montreal, Que.
Leila SlossFamily physician practising in Halifax, NS.
Jonathan BerkowitzFull-time instructor in the Sauder School of Business and an associate member of the Department of Family Practice in the Faculty of Medicine at the University of British Columbia.
Nardia StrydomDepartment Head of Family Medicine at Providence Health Care and Clinical Assistant Professor in the Faculty of Medicine at the University of British Columbia.
Rita McCrackenAssociate Department Head of Family Medicine at Providence Health Care, Clinical Assistant Professor at the University of British Columbia, and a doctoral candidate in the Department of Family Practice in the Faculty of Medicine at the University of British Columbia. rita.mccracken@ubc.ca.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo describe the demographic characteristics of patients who present to the emergency department (ED) for low-acuity issues and to explore their self-reported contact with other sources of primary health care before presenting to the ED.

designSurvey distributed in the ED waiting room.

settingA high-volume ED in Vancouver, BC.

participantsA total of 232 respondents aged 18 years or older in the ED waiting room.

main outcome measuresActions taken to seek health care for the current issue before presenting to the ED and predictors of first seeking nonurgent care.

resultsOf the 398 people approached, 232 (58.3%) people completed the survey. Exactly half (95% CI 43.6% to 56.4%) sought alternative care before presenting to the ED. Predictors for having sought alternative care included illness presentation and longer symptom duration, while injury presentation and work-related presentation were associated with not seeking alternative care. Most participants (162 patients, 87.6%) believed that the ED was the most appropriate place for them to receive care for their problem, while only 87 (45.3%) believed that an adjacent primary care clinic would be an acceptable alternative.

conclusionMany patients do attempt to seek alternative care before presenting to the ED with low acuity issues. Most patients believe that the ED is the best place for them to receive care and are uncertain about using a primary care alternative. Further research is needed to explore barriers and motivators patients face in their decisions to seek care, as well as potential patient education methods to improve appropriate ED use.

Indexed as

AdultBritish ColumbiaEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleHealth Care SurveysHealth Services AccessibilityHealth Services Needs and DemandHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient Acceptance of Health CarePrimary Health Care

Identifiers

PMID30108090
PMCPMC6189897

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.