Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30108066›Full record

ArticleBlood2018

Proton therapy for adults with mediastinal lymphomas: the International Lymphoma Radiation Oncology Group guidelines.

Bouthaina Shbib Dabaja, Bradford S Hoppe, John P Plastaras, Wayne Newhauser, Katerina Rosolova, Stella Flampouri, Radhe Mohan, N George Mikhaeel, Youlia Kirova, Lena Specht and 1 more

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Blood, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 59 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
59citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
16.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

59 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 117 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Guideline
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Long Term Results of Proton Therapy in Adult Infradiaphragmatic Lymphoma.International journal of particle therapy · 2026
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Towards proton therapy guidelines for radiation therapists and dosimetrists: A scoping review.Technical innovations & patient support in radiation oncology · 2025
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 9 institutions in 5 countries.

Bouthaina Shbib DabajaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.ORCID 0000-0002-1226-0681
Bradford S HoppeDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida, Jacksonville, FL.
John P PlastarasDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
Wayne NewhauserDepartment of Radiation Physics, University of Louisiana, Baton Rouge, LA.
Katerina RosolovaProton Therapy Department, Proton Therapy Center Czech, Prague, Czech Republic.
Stella FlampouriDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida, Jacksonville, FL.
Radhe MohanDepartment of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
N George MikhaeelDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Guy's and St. Thomas' Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
Youlia KirovaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Institut Curie, Paris, France.
Lena SpechtDepartment of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark; and.
Joachim YahalomDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USUniversity of Florida · USCharles University · CZCopenhagen University Hospital · DKInstitut Curie · FRLouisiana State University · USMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USSt Thomas' Hospital · GBUniversity of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Among adult lymphoma survivors, radiation treatment techniques that increase the excess radiation dose to organs at risk (OARs) put patients at risk for increased side effects, especially late toxicities. Minimizing radiation to OARs in adults patients with Hodgkin and non-Hodgkin lymphomas involving the mediastinum is the deciding factor for the choice of treatment modality. Proton therapy may help to reduce the radiation dose to the OARs and reduce toxicities, especially the risks for cardiac morbidity and second cancers. Because proton therapy may have some disadvantages, identifying the patients and the circumstances that may benefit the most from proton therapy is important. We present modern guidelines to identify adult lymphoma patients who may derive the greatest benefit from proton therapy, along with an analysis of the advantages and disadvantages of proton treatment.

Indexed as

Proton TherapyAdultHumansInternational AgenciesLymphomaMediastinal NeoplasmsOrgans at RiskPractice Guidelines as TopicRadiation InjuriesRadiotherapy DosageRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted

Identifiers

PMID30108066
PMCPMC6212652
OpenAlexW2887522159

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.