Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30107783›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2018

In-solution Y-chromosome capture-enrichment on ancient DNA libraries.

Diana I Cruz-Dávalos, María A Nieves-Colón, Alexandra Sockell, G David Poznik, Hannes Schroeder, Anne C Stone, Carlos D Bustamante, Anna-Sapfo Malaspinas, María C Ávila-Arcos

Open access · goldAbstract readHistorical Article
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Paleogenomic insights into the red complex bacteriaPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2020
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 7 institutions in 5 countries.

Diana I Cruz-DávalosInstitute of Ecology and Evolution, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
María A Nieves-ColónSchool of Human Evolution and Social Change, Arizona State University, Tempe, USA.
Alexandra SockellDepartment of Genetics, Stanford University, Stanford, USA.
G David Poznik23andMe, Mountain View, USA.
Hannes SchroederNatural History Museum of Denmark, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Anne C StoneSchool of Human Evolution and Social Change, Arizona State University, Tempe, USA.
Carlos D BustamanteDepartment of Genetics, Stanford University, Stanford, USA.
Anna-Sapfo MalaspinasInstitute of Ecology and Evolution, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland. annasapfo.malaspinas@unil.ch.
María C Ávila-ArcosInternational Laboratory for Human Genome Research, National Autonomous University of Mexico, Mexico, Mexico. mavila@liigh.unam.mx.
Arizona State University · USStanford University · US23andMe (United States) · USSIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics · CHUniversidad Nacional Autónoma de México · MXUniversity of Copenhagen · DKUniversity of Lausanne · CH

Funding

European Research Council FP7/2007-2013, grant no. 290344, EUROTASTUniversidad Nacional Autónoma de México IA206817
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAs most ancient biological samples have low levels of endogenous DNA, it is advantageous to enrich for specific genomic regions prior to sequencing. One approach-in-solution capture-enrichment-retrieves sequences of interest and reduces the fraction of microbial DNA. In this work, we implement a capture-enrichment approach targeting informative regions of the Y chromosome in six human archaeological remains excavated in the Caribbean and dated between 200 and 3000 years BP. We compare the recovery rate of Y-chromosome capture (YCC) alone, whole-genome capture followed by YCC (WGC + YCC) versus non-enriched (pre-capture) libraries.

resultsThe six samples show different levels of initial endogenous content, with very low (< 0.05%, 4 samples) or low (0.1-1.54%, 2 samples) percentages of sequenced reads mapping to the human genome. We recover 12-9549 times more targeted unique Y-chromosome sequences after capture, where 0.0-6.2% (WGC + YCC) and 0.0-23.5% (YCC) of the sequence reads were on-target, compared to 0.0-0.00003% pre-capture. In samples with endogenous DNA content greater than 0.1%, we found that WGC followed by YCC (WGC + YCC) yields lower enrichment due to the loss of complexity in consecutive capture experiments, whereas in samples with lower endogenous content, the libraries' initial low complexity leads to minor proportions of Y-chromosome reads. Finally, increasing recovery of informative sites enabled us to assign Y-chromosome haplogroups to some of the archeological remains and gain insights about their paternal lineages and origins.

conclusionsWe present to our knowledge the first in-solution capture-enrichment method targeting the human Y-chromosome in aDNA sequencing libraries. YCC and WGC + YCC enrichments lead to an increase in the amount of Y-DNA sequences, as compared to libraries not enriched for the Y-chromosome. Our probe design effectively recovers regions of the Y-chromosome bearing phylogenetically informative sites, allowing us to identify paternal lineages with less sequencing than needed for pre-capture libraries. Finally, we recommend considering the endogenous content in the experimental design and avoiding consecutive rounds of capture, as clonality increases considerably with each round.

Indexed as

Chromosomes, Human, YGene LibraryDNA, AncientGenomicsHistory, AncientHumansSequence Analysis, DNAWhole Genome SequencingDNA, AncientAncient DNACapture-enrichmentY chromosome

Identifiers

PMID30107783
PMCPMC6092841
OpenAlexW2951859934

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.