Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30107580›Full record

ArticleNeurosurgery2019

Is Visible Aminolevulinic Acid-Induced Fluorescence an Independent Biomarker for Prognosis in Histologically Confirmed (World Health Organization 2016) Low-Grade Gliomas?

Mohammed Jaber, Christian Ewelt, Johannes Wölfer, Benjamin Brokinkel, Christian Thomas, Martin Hasselblatt, Oliver Grauer, Walter Stummer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurosurgery, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Mohammed JaberDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany.
Christian EweltDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany.
Johannes WölferDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany.
Benjamin BrokinkelDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany.
Christian ThomasInstitute of Neuropathology, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany.
Martin HasselblattInstitute of Neuropathology, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany.
Oliver GrauerDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany.
Walter StummerDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundApproximately 20% of low-grade gliomas (LGG) display visible protoporphyrin fluorescence during surgery after 5-aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA) administration.

objectiveTo determine if fluorescence represents a prognostic marker in LGG.

methodsSeventy-four consecutive patients with LGG (World Health Organization 2016) were operated on with 5-ALA. Fluorescent tissue was specifically biopsied. Tumor size, age, Karnofsky index, contrast-enhancement, fluorescence, and molecular factors (IDH1/IDH2-mutations, Ki67/MIB1 Index, 1p19q codeletions, ATRX, EGFR, p53 expression, and O6-methylguanine DNA methyltransferase promotor methylation), were related to progression-free survival (PFS), malignant transformation-free survival (MTFS) and overall survival (OS).

resultsSixteen of seventy-four LGGs (21.6%) fluoresced. Fluorescence was partially related to weak enhancement on magnetic resonance imaging and increased (positron emission tomography)PET-FET uptake, but not to Karnofsky Performance Score, tumor size, or age. Regarding molecular markers, only EGFR expression differed marginally (fluorescing vs nonfluorescing: 19% vs 5%; P = .057). Median follow-up was 46.4 mo (95% confidence interval [CI]: 41.8-51.1). PFS, MTFS, and OS were shorter in fluorescing tumors (PFS: median 9.8 mo, 95% CI: 1.00-27.7 vs 45.8, 31.9-59.7, MTFS: 43.0 [27.5-58.5] vs 64.6 [57.7-71.5], median not reached, P = .015; OS: 51.6, [34.8-68.3] vs [68.2, 62.7-73.8], P = .002). IDH mutations significantly predicted PFS, MTFS, and OS. In multivariate analysis IDH status and fluorescence both independently predicted MTFS and OS. PFS was not independently predicted by fluorescence.

conclusionThis is the first report investigating the role of ALA-induced fluorescence in histologically confirmed LGG. Fluorescence appeared to be a marker for inherent malignant transformation and OS, independently of known prognostic markers. Fluorescence in LGG might be taken into account when deciding on adjuvant therapies.

Indexed as

AdultAminolevulinic AcidBiomarkersBiopsyBrain NeoplasmsFemaleFluorescenceGliomaHumansKarnofsky Performance StatusMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedPositron-Emission TomographyPrognosisProtoporphyrinsAminolevulinic AcidBiomarkersprotoporphyrin IXProtoporphyrins5-ALADiffuse astrocytomaFuorescence-guided resectionLow-grade gliomaMalignization transformation-free survival (MTFS)PET

Identifiers

PMID30107580
PMCPMC6537633

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.