ReviewJournal of animal science2018
Conceptual framework for investigating causal effects from observational data in livestock.
Review in Journal of animal science, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Inferring genetic values and variances from pre-processed phenotypes.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- ASAS-NANP Symposium: mathematical modeling in animal nutrition: construction of supervised machine learning regression pipelines for livestock data modeling: a case studys.Journal of animal science · 2026Article
- Comprehensive farm-level analysis of environmental and management descriptors for developing an efficient genetic evaluation of pasture-raised beef cattle.Translational animal science · 2025Article
- Measuring the impact of sow farm outbreaks with PRRS virus on the downstream mortality using causal inference methods.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2025Article
- What question are we trying to answer? Embracing causal inference.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2024Article
- Field Implementation of Forecasting Models for Predicting Nursery Mortality in a Midwestern US Swine Production System.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023Article
- Translating insights from the seed metabolome into improved prediction for lipid-composition traits in oat (Avena sativa L.).Genetics · 2021Article
- Forecasting beef production and quality using large-scale integrated data from Brazil.Journal of animal science · 2020Article
- Investigating causal biological relationships between reproductive performance traits in high-performing gilts and sows1.Journal of animal science · 2019Article
- Generalized additive mixed model on the analysis of total transport losses of market-weight pigs1.Journal of animal science · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Understanding causal mechanisms among variables is critical to efficient management of complex biological systems such as animal agriculture production. The increasing availability of data from commercial livestock operations offers unique opportunities for attaining causal insight, despite the inherently observational nature of these data. Causal claims based on observational data are substantiated by recent theoretical and methodological developments in the rapidly evolving field of causal inference. Thus, the objectives of this review are as follows: 1) to introduce a unifying conceptual framework for investigating causal effects from observational data in livestock, 2) to illustrate its implementation in the context of the animal sciences, and 3) to discuss opportunities and challenges associated with this framework. Foundational to the proposed conceptual framework are graphical objects known as directed acyclic graphs (DAGs). As mathematical constructs and practical tools, DAGs encode putative structural mechanisms underlying causal models together with their probabilistic implications. The process of DAG elicitation and causal identification is central to any causal claims based on observational data. We further discuss necessary causal assumptions and associated limitations to causal inference. Last, we provide practical recommendations to facilitate implementation of causal inference from observational data in the context of the animal sciences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.