Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30106874›Full record

ReviewShock (Augusta, Ga.)2019

Part I: Minimum Quality Threshold in Preclinical Sepsis Studies (MQTiPSS) for Study Design and Humane Modeling Endpoints.

Basilia Zingarelli, Craig M Coopersmith, Susanne Drechsler, Philip Efron, John C Marshall, Lyle Moldawer, W Joost Wiersinga, Xianzhong Xiao, Marcin F Osuchowski, Christoph Thiemermann

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Shock (Augusta, Ga.), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Development and validation of a rabbit model ofAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. The poikilothermic hypothesis of sepsis.Critical care (London, England) · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. TGFBI Inhibits the Pyroptosis of Macrophages to Ameliorate Septic Shock.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Mouse Models of Sepsis.Current protocols · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Basilia ZingarelliDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Critical Care Medicine, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, College of Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio.
Craig M CoopersmithEmory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.
Susanne DrechslerLudwig Boltzmann Institute for Experimental and Clinical Traumatology in the AUVA Research Center, Vienna, Austria.
Philip EfronSepsis and Critical Illness Research Center, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, Florida.
John C MarshallKeenan Research Centre for Biomedical Science, St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Lyle MoldawerSepsis and Critical Illness Research Center, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, Florida.
W Joost WiersingaDivision of Infectious Diseases, Center for Experimental and Molecular Medicine, The Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Xianzhong XiaoXiangya School of Medicine, Central South University, Chagnsha, Hunan, China.
Marcin F OsuchowskiLudwig Boltzmann Institute for Experimental and Clinical Traumatology in the AUVA Research Center, Vienna, Austria.
Christoph ThiemermannThe William Harvey Research Institute, Barts and London School of Medicine & Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom.

Funding

Mechanisms of Intestinal Integrity in Sepsis and ShockR01GM072808 · NIGMS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI COOPERSMITH, CRAIG M · 2005 to 2021
$5.1M
PPARgamma and PPARgamma agonists in septic shockR01GM067202 · NIGMS · CINCINNATI CHILDRENS HOSP MED CTR · PI ZINGARELLI, BASILIA · 2003 to 2015
$3.9M
AGE-DEPENDENT MECHANISMS OF METABOLIC RECOVERY IN HEMORRHAGIC SHOCKR01GM115973 · NIGMS · CINCINNATI CHILDRENS HOSP MED CTR · PI ZINGARELLI, BASILIA · 2015 to 2022
$2.7M
The Impact of Cancer on the Pathophysiology of SepsisR01GM104323 · NIGMS · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI COOPERSMITH, CRAIG M, FORD, MANDY L · 2013 to 2021
$2.4M
The Impact of Chronic Alcohol Abuse on the Pathophysiology of SepsisR01GM109779 · NIGMS · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI COOPERSMITH, CRAIG M, FORD, MANDY L · 2014 to 2017
$1.2M
Targeting 2B4 Coinhibitory Signals During Sepsis-Induced Immune DysregulationR01GM113228 · NIGMS · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI COOPERSMITH, CRAIG M, FORD, MANDY L · 2015 to 2018
$1.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM067202NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM072808NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM104323NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM109779NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM113228NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM115973
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Preclinical animal studies are mandatory before new treatments can be tested in clinical trials. However, their use in developing new therapies for sepsis has been controversial because of limitations of the models and inconsistencies with the clinical conditions. In consideration of the revised definition for clinical sepsis and septic shock (Sepsis-3), a Wiggers-Bernard Conference was held in Vienna in May 2017 to propose standardized guidelines on preclinical sepsis modeling. The participants conducted a literature review of 260 most highly cited scientific articles on sepsis models published between 2003 and 2012. The review showed, for example, that mice were used in 79% and euthanasia criteria were defined in 9% of the studies. Part I of this report details the recommendations for study design and humane modeling endpoints that should be addressed in sepsis models. The first recommendation is that survival follow-up should reflect the clinical time course of the infectious agent used in the sepsis model. Furthermore, it is recommended that therapeutic interventions should be initiated after the septic insult replicating clinical care. To define an unbiased and reproducible association between a new treatment and outcome, a randomization and blinding of treatments as well as inclusion of all methodological details in scientific publications is essential. In all preclinical sepsis studies, the high standards of animal welfare must be implemented. Therefore, development and validation of specific criteria for monitoring pain and distress, and euthanasia of septic animals, as well as the use of analgesics are recommended. A set of four considerations is also proposed to enhance translation potential of sepsis models. Relevant biological variables and comorbidities should be included in the study design and sepsis modeling should be extended to mammalian species other than rodents. In addition, the need for source control (in case of a defined infection focus) should be considered. These recommendations and considerations are proposed as "best practices" for animal models of sepsis that should be implemented.

Indexed as

Models, AnimalShock, SepticAnimalsHumansMice

Identifiers

PMID30106874
PMCPMC6296871

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.