Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30106758›Full record

ArticleApplied immunohistochemistry & molecular morphology : AIMM2019

Lymphocyte-to-Monocyte Ratio May Serve as a Better Prognostic Indicator Than Tumor-associated Macrophages in DLBCL Treated With Rituximab.

Eri Matsuki, Olga L Bohn, Siraj El Jamal, Janine D Pichardo, Andrew D Zelenetz, Anas Younes, Julie Teruya-Feldstein

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied immunohistochemistry & molecular morphology : AIMM, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. The Prognostic Impact of Tumor Microenvironment and Checkpoint Blockade-Associated Molecules (PD-1, PD-L1, CD163 and CD14) in Nodal Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma, NOS.Indian journal of hematology & blood transfusion : an official journal of Indian Society of Hematology and Blood Transfusion · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Eri MatsukiLymphoma Service, Department of Medicine.
Olga L BohnDepartment of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center.
Siraj El JamalDepartment of Pathology, Mount Sinai Health System, Ichan School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY.
Janine D PichardoDepartment of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center.
Andrew D ZelenetzLymphoma Service, Department of Medicine.
Anas YounesLymphoma Service, Department of Medicine.
Julie Teruya-FeldsteinDepartment of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center.
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USMount Sinai Health System · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
ZIPRASIDONE (GEODON) AUGMENTATION IN SEROTONIN REUPTAKE INHIBITOR-RESISTANT OBM01RR000071 · NCRR · MOUNT SINAI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE OF NYU · PI NEWCORN, JEFFREY H · 1985 to 2009
$41.5M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NCRR NIH HHS M01 RR000071
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There are multiple prognostic indicators for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) including the international prognostic index (IPI), and gene expression profiling (GEP) to classify the disease into germinal center B-cell and activated B-cell subtypes, the latter harboring inferior prognosis. More recently, tumor-associated macrophages (TAM) and lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR) were found to have prognostic implications in DLBCL. However, consensus is yet to be reached in terms of the significance of each. In this study, we evaluated the prognostic value of TAM as assessed by CD163 or CD68 positivity by immunohistochemistry on tissue biopsies and LMR was calculated from peripheral blood differential, with focus on the inclusion of rituximab as a treatment modality. The number of CD68-positive cells in the tumor microenvironment did not exhibit significant prognostic value, whereas higher number of CD163-positive cells was associated with inferior overall survival in patients treated with chemotherapy alone. This effect was no longer evident in patients treated with rituximab containing chemoimmunotherapy. In contrast, the prognostic significance of LMR on survival was more persistent regardless of treatment. There was no association between LMR and the number of CD163-positive cells. Our results suggest that LMR is the more easily and widely available prognostic marker in this era of chemoimmunotherapy. Our finding supports previous literature that the effect of TAM can vary according to treatment. Interaction between rituximab and TAM warrant further scientific investigation for mechanistic insights into targeted therapeutics.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntigens, CDAntigens, Differentiation, MyelomonocyticAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalCD163 AntigenCD68 MoleculeFemaleHumansImmunohistochemistryLymphocyte CountLymphocytesLymphoma, Large B-Cell, DiffuseMacrophagesAntigens, CDAntigens, Differentiation, MyelomonocyticAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalCD163 AntigenCD68 antigen, humanCD68 MoleculeReceptors, Cell SurfaceRituximab

Identifiers

PMID30106758
PMCPMC6374215
OpenAlexW2886631461

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.