Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30106713›Full record

ArticleIEEE transactions on medical imaging2019

An Empirical Data Inconsistency Metric (DIM) Driven CT Image Reconstruction Method.

Yinsheng Li, Guang-Hong Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in IEEE transactions on medical imaging, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Yinsheng Li
Guang-Hong Chen

Funding

One Stop Shop Imaging for Acute Ischemic StrokeTreatmentU01EB021183 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI CHEN, GUANG-HONG · 2015 to 2020
$3.5M
NIBIB NIH HHS U01 EB021183
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Current computed tomography (CT) image reconstruction methods generally assume that a complete and consistent data set was acquired during data acquisition. In practice, however, the acquired data are often not consistent from one view angle to another. In this case, the application of a well-developed image reconstruction algorithm to an inconsistent data set still generates artifacts in the reconstructed images. Therefore, it is highly desirable to develop a simple method to classify the acquired data set into several consistency classes and to incorporate the data consistency information into an image reconstruction framework to simultaneously reconstruct several sub-images of the same image object according to the data consistency level of the acquired data set. In this paper, an empirical data inconsistency metric (DIM) was introduced to characterize the inconsistency level of the acquired cone beam CT projection data at each view angle caused by the polychromatic X-ray spectrum and the use of tube potential modulation. The entire acquired data set is then sorted into several subsets of view angles based upon the value of the DIM at each view angle. After data classification, the previously published algorithm, synchronized multiartifact reduction with tomographic reconstruction, was applied to simultaneously reconstruct images for these sub-images in different spectral consistency classes. Each sub-image is consistent with the subset of the projection view angles for a given range of DIM values. To validate the method, numerical simulation studies from an anthropomorphic numerical phantom, a hybrid phantom of known truth with human anatomy, and in vivo human subject data were conducted to demonstrate the practical utility of the proposed method.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsHeadHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedModels, BiologicalPhantoms, ImagingTomography, X-Ray Computed

Identifiers

PMID30106713
PMCPMC6758549

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.