ArticleIEEE transactions on medical imaging2019
An Empirical Data Inconsistency Metric (DIM) Driven CT Image Reconstruction Method.
Article in IEEE transactions on medical imaging, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Current computed tomography (CT) image reconstruction methods generally assume that a complete and consistent data set was acquired during data acquisition. In practice, however, the acquired data are often not consistent from one view angle to another. In this case, the application of a well-developed image reconstruction algorithm to an inconsistent data set still generates artifacts in the reconstructed images. Therefore, it is highly desirable to develop a simple method to classify the acquired data set into several consistency classes and to incorporate the data consistency information into an image reconstruction framework to simultaneously reconstruct several sub-images of the same image object according to the data consistency level of the acquired data set. In this paper, an empirical data inconsistency metric (DIM) was introduced to characterize the inconsistency level of the acquired cone beam CT projection data at each view angle caused by the polychromatic X-ray spectrum and the use of tube potential modulation. The entire acquired data set is then sorted into several subsets of view angles based upon the value of the DIM at each view angle. After data classification, the previously published algorithm, synchronized multiartifact reduction with tomographic reconstruction, was applied to simultaneously reconstruct images for these sub-images in different spectral consistency classes. Each sub-image is consistent with the subset of the projection view angles for a given range of DIM values. To validate the method, numerical simulation studies from an anthropomorphic numerical phantom, a hybrid phantom of known truth with human anatomy, and in vivo human subject data were conducted to demonstrate the practical utility of the proposed method.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.