Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30106689›Full record

ArticleIEEE/ACM transactions on computational biology and bioinformatics

Deep Neural Networks for In Situ Hybridization Grid Completion and Clustering.

Yujie Li, Heng Huang, Hanbo Chen, Tianming Liu

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in IEEE/ACM transactions on computational biology and bioinformatics. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Yujie Li
Heng Huang
Hanbo Chen
Tianming Liu
University of Georgia · US

Funding

Assessing Large-scale Connectivities in Prenatal Cocaine Exposure Affected BrainsR01DA033393 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA · PI HU, XIAOPING P, LIU, TIANMING · 2012 to 2016
$1.6M
Assessing Large-scale Brain Connectivities in Mild Cognitive ImpairmentR01AG042599 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA · PI LIU, TIANMING · 2013 to 2017
$1.4M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG042599NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA033393
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Transcriptome in brain plays a crucial role in understanding the cortical organization and the development of brain structure and function. Two challenges, incomplete data and high dimensionality of transcriptome, remain unsolved. Here, we present a novel training scheme that successfully adapts the U-net architecture to the problem of volume recovery. By analogy to denoising autoencoder, we hide a portion of each training sample so that the network can learn to recover missing voxels from context. Then on the completed volumes, we show that Restricted Boltzmann Machines (RBMs) can be used to infer co-occurrences among voxels, providing foundations for dividing the cortex into discrete subregions. As we stack multiple RBMs to form a deep belief network (DBN), we progressively map the high-dimensional raw input into abstract representations and create a hierarchy of transcriptome architecture. A coarse to fine organization emerges from the network layers. This organization incidentally corresponds to the anatomical structures, suggesting a close link between structures and the genetic underpinnings. Thus, we demonstrate a new way of learning transcriptome-based hierarchical organization using RBM and DBN.

Indexed as

Neural Networks, ComputerAnimalsAtlases as TopicBrainCluster AnalysisComputational BiologyGene Expression ProfilingImage Processing, Computer-AssistedIn Situ HybridizationMiceTranscriptome

Identifiers

PMID30106689
PMCPMC7199204
OpenAlexW2886425448

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.