Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30106516›Full record

ArticleArthritis care & research2019

Contraception Use Among Reproductive-Age Women With Rheumatic Diseases.

Mehret Birru Talabi, Megan E B Clowse, Susan J Blalock, Larry Moreland, Nalyn Siripong, Sonya Borrero

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Arthritis care & research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Family Planning and Rheumatoid Arthritis.Current rheumatology reports · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Contraceptive Care in the Rheumatic Diseases: A Review.Journal of clinical rheumatology : practical reports on rheumatic & musculoskeletal diseases · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Observational
  19. Observational
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mehret Birru TalabiUniversity of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Megan E B ClowseDuke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
Susan J BlalockUniversity of North Carolina Eshelman School of Pharmacy, Chapel Hill.
Larry MorelandUniversity of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Nalyn SiripongUniversity of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Sonya BorreroUniversity of Pittsburgh and Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, Veterans Administration Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.

Funding

Patient-Centered Outcomes Research (PCOR) Scholars ProgramK12HS022989 · AHRQ · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI KAPOOR, WISHWA N · 2014 to 2018
$3.9M
AHRQ HHS K12 HS022989
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo determine contraception use among a cohort of reproductive-age women (ages 18-50 years) with rheumatic diseases.

methodsWe conducted a study of administrative data from a single, large medical center between the years 2013 and 2014. Women who had 1 of 21 possible rheumatic disease diagnoses and had at least 2 outpatient rheumatology visits were included in this analysis. We used logistic regression analyses to evaluate adjusted associations between the use of prescription contraception, use of potentially fetotoxic medications, and visits with rheumatologists, primary care providers, and gynecologists.

resultsOf 2,455 women in this sample, 32.1% received any prescription contraception, and 7.9% of women used highly effective prescription methods (intrauterine devices, implants, and surgical sterilization). More than 70% of women took ≥1 type of fetotoxic medication during the 2-year study timeframe. Fetotoxic medication use was not associated with overall use of prescription contraception, but was associated with the use of highly effective contraceptive methods (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 2.26 [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.44-3.54]). Women who saw gynecologists or primary care providers were more likely to use prescription contraception overall (adjusted OR 3.35 [95% CI 2.77-4.05] and 1.43 [95% CI 1.18-1.73], respectively). Women who saw gynecologists were more likely to use highly versus moderately effective contraceptive methods (adjusted OR 2.35 [95% CI 1.41-3.94]). Rheumatology visits were not associated with use of prescription contraception in any models.

conclusionThis is the largest study to date to describe contraceptive use among reproductive-age women with rheumatic diseases, and the findings reveal low use of prescription contraception. Urgent efforts are needed to improve contraceptive care and access for some women with rheumatic diseases.

Indexed as

Contraceptive Agents, FemaleRheumatic DiseasesAdolescentAdultContraceptionContraception BehaviorFemaleHumansMiddle AgedYoung AdultContraceptive Agents, Female

Identifiers

PMID30106516
PMCPMC6375807

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.