Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30106254›Full record

ArticleBrain and behavior2018

Nest-building activity as a reproducible and long-term stroke deficit test in a mouse model of stroke.

Dong Yuan, Chunli Liu, Jiang Wu, Bingren Hu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain and behavior, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Tell-tale TINT: Does the Time to Incorporate into Nest Test Evaluate Postsurgical Pain or Welfare in Mice?Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS · 2020
    Article
  15. Optimizing functional outcome endpoints for stroke recovery studies.Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism · 2019
    Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Dong YuanDepartment of Anesthesiology and Neurology, Shock Trauma and Anesthesiology Research Center, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Chunli LiuDepartment of Anesthesiology and Neurology, Shock Trauma and Anesthesiology Research Center, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Jiang WuDepartment of Neurology, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China.
Bingren HuDepartment of Anesthesiology and Neurology, Shock Trauma and Anesthesiology Research Center, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.ORCID 0000-0003-4002-2784
University of Maryland, Baltimore · USJilin University · CN

Funding

Novel anti-NPC aggregation strategy against brain ischemia-reperfusion injuryR01NS097875 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI HU, BINGREN · 2017 to 2021
$1.7M
Change in NSF ATPase activity Leads to Brain Ischemia Reperfusion InjuryR01NS102815 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI HU, BINGREN · 2018 to 2023
$1.7M
An Innovative Approach to Study Alzheimer Disease Blood BiomarkersR21AG052734 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI HU, BINGREN · 2016 to 2017
$424k
Dysfunction of the membrane trafficking leads to ischemia-reperfusion brain injuryI01BX003926 · VA · BALTIMORE VA MEDICAL CENTER · PI HU, BINGREN · 2018 to 2020
–
BLRD VA I01 BX003926NIA NIH HHS R21 AG052734NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS097875NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS102815
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionNeuroprotective therapeutics achieved from animal studies have not been able to translate into clinical stroke therapies. A major reason may be that the functional tests and outcomes between animal stroke studies and clinical trials are significantly different. Ultimately, functional recovery is most important for stroke patients, but it remains challenging to identify animal functional tests that reflect human stroke deficits. This study aimed to explore whether the nest-building activity can be used as a functional test of mouse stroke deficit.

methodsForty-one C57B6 male mice were randomly assigned into a sham-operated control group and 20-, 40- and 60-min middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAO) groups. Mice were perfusion-fixed at 21 days following sham surgery or MCAO. Infarct volumes were assessed under the light microscopy. The nest-building activity was characterized and quantitatively evaluated.

resultsThe results show that only a small portion of striatum was damaged after 20-min MCAO. The brain damage areas were expanded from striatum to the neocortex and hippocampus proportionally after 40-min and 60-min MCAO, respectively. Consistently, relative to that of the sham-operated mice, the nest-building activity was insignificantly altered after 20-min MCAO, but dramatically and significantly reduced proportionally following 40-min and 60-min MCAO, respectively. The nest-building deficit was a long-lasting event and could be seen for as long as 14-21 days of recovery, the longest endpoint of this study.

conclusionsThe results suggest that the nest-building activity may be a novel, objective, easy to use, highly sensitive, and long-lasting test that may reflect the multifaceted sensorimotor and cognitive deficits after stroke in humans. Our findings may provide a novel multifaceted test for bridging the gap between animal stroke studies and clinical trials.

Indexed as

AnimalsCognition DisordersDisease Models, AnimalInfarction, Middle Cerebral ArteryMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLNesting BehaviorRandom AllocationRecovery of FunctionSensorimotor CortexStrokebehavior testcognitionfunctional testhistopathologyMCAOmouse strokemouse stroke modelnest‐building activitysensorimotor function deficit and recoverywell‐being

Identifiers

PMID30106254
PMCPMC5991586
OpenAlexW2800333169

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.