Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30106087›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular medicine2018

Synergistic effect of ursodeoxycholic acid on the antitumor activity of sorafenib in hepatocellular carcinoma cells via modulation of STAT3 and ERK.

Seulki Lee, Young Youn Cho, Eun Ju Cho, Su Jong Yu, Jeong-Hoon Lee, Jung-Hwan Yoon, Yoon Jun Kim

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. The role of bile acids in carcinogenesis.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2022
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Seulki LeeDepartment of Internal Medicine and Liver Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul 110‑799, Republic of Korea.
Young Youn ChoDepartment of Internal Medicine and Liver Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul 110‑799, Republic of Korea.
Eun Ju ChoDepartment of Internal Medicine and Liver Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul 110‑799, Republic of Korea.
Su Jong YuDepartment of Internal Medicine and Liver Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul 110‑799, Republic of Korea.
Jeong-Hoon LeeDepartment of Internal Medicine and Liver Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul 110‑799, Republic of Korea.
Jung-Hwan YoonDepartment of Internal Medicine and Liver Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul 110‑799, Republic of Korea.
Yoon Jun KimDepartment of Internal Medicine and Liver Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul 110‑799, Republic of Korea.
Seoul National University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sorafenib has been approved for the treatment of advanced stage hepatocellular carcinoma but has limited efficacy. Ursodeoxycholic acid exerts cytoprotective activities in hepatocytes and is believed to suppress tumorigenesis through cell cycle arrest and induction of apoptosis. The present study examined whether co‑treatment with ursodeoxycholic acid has a synergistic effect on the antitumor activity of sorafenib in hepatocellular carcinoma cells. Notably, co‑treatment with both agents more effectively inhibited cell proliferation than sorafenib or ursodeoxycholic acid alone. Furthermore, co‑treatment inhibited the phosphorylation of signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3) and activated extracellular signal‑regulated kinase (ERK), a mitogen‑activated protein kinase, accompanied by excessive intracellular reactive oxygen species generation in hepatocellular carcinoma cells. Thus, chemotherapy with sorafenib and ursodeoxycholic combination may be efficacious in hepatocellular carcinoma by inhibiting cell proliferation and inducing apoptosis through reactive oxygen species‑dependent activation of ERK and dephosphorylation of STAT3. The present findings may represent a promising therapeutic strategy for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.

Indexed as

ApoptosisBlotting, WesternCarcinoma, HepatocellularCell SurvivalExtracellular Signal-Regulated MAP KinasesHep G2 CellsHumansLiver NeoplasmsPhosphorylationReactive Oxygen SpeciesSignal TransductionSorafenibSTAT3 Transcription FactorUrsodeoxycholic AcidExtracellular Signal-Regulated MAP KinasesReactive Oxygen SpeciesSorafenibSTAT3 protein, humanSTAT3 Transcription FactorUrsodeoxycholic Acid

Identifiers

PMID30106087
PMCPMC6192782
OpenAlexW2887782264

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.