Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30106038›Full record

ArticleNeural regeneration research2018

Amnion epithelial cells - a novel therapy for ischemic stroke?

Megan A Evans, Brad R S Broughton, Grant R Drummond, Henry Ma, Thanh G Phan, Euan M Wallace, Rebecca Lim, Christopher G Sobey

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neural regeneration research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. The central role of peripheral inflammation in ischemic stroke.Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Neural regeneration research · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Megan A EvansDepartment of Physiology, Anatomy & Microbiology, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia.
Brad R S BroughtonCardiovascular Disease Program, Department of Pharmacology, Biomedicine Discovery Institute, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Grant R DrummondDepartment of Physiology, Anatomy & Microbiology, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia.
Henry MaDepartment of Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Thanh G PhanDepartment of Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Euan M WallaceThe Ritchie Centre, Hudson Institute of Medical Research; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Rebecca LimThe Ritchie Centre, Hudson Institute of Medical Research; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Christopher G SobeyDepartment of Physiology, Anatomy & Microbiology, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia.
Monash University · AULa Trobe University · AUAustralian Regenerative Medicine Institute · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Stroke is a leading cause of death and disability and new therapies are desperately needed. Given the complex nature of ischemic brain injury, it has been postulated that cell-based therapies may be useful. However, cell resources, invasive extraction procedures, immunological rejection, tumorigenesis and ethical challenges make it unlikely that many stem cell types could serve as a practical source for therapy. By contrast, these issues do not pertain to human amnion epithelial cells (hAECs), which are placenta-derived stem cells. We recently assessed the effects of systemically delivered hAECs on stroke outcome using four animal models of stroke. We demonstrated that when injected intravenously after ischemia onset, hAECs migrate preferentially to the spleen and injured brain to limit apoptosis and inflammation, and attenuate early brain infiltration of immune cells, progression of infarction and systemic immunosuppression and to ultimately ameliorate functional deficits. When administration of hAECs is delayed by 1-3 days post-stroke, long-term functional recovery can still be enhanced in young and aged mice of either sex. Moreover, our proof-of-principle findings suggest that hAECs are effective at limiting post-stroke infarct development in non-human primates. Overall, the results suggest that hAECs could be a viable clinical stroke therapy.

Indexed as

brain repaircerebral infarctionhuman amnion epithelial cellsimmunosuppressioninflammationischemic strokemousenon-human primatestem cells

Identifiers

PMID30106038
PMCPMC6108203
OpenAlexW2886611121

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.