Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30105865›Full record

ArticleSociology of health & illness2019

Gender dynamics in the donation field: human tissue donation for research, therapy and feeding.

Julie Kent, Maria Fannin, Sally Dowling

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sociology of health & illness, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Oocyte Biobanks: Old Assumptions and New Challenges.Biotech (Basel (Switzerland)) · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Exchanging breastmilk: Introduction.Maternal & child nutrition · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Julie KentDepartment of Health and Social Sciences, University of the West of England, Bristol, UK.
Maria FanninSchool of Geographical Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8922-2499
Sally DowlingDepartment of Nursing and Midwifery, University of the West of England, Bristol, UK.

Funding

Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 100698/Z/12/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper examines how gender dynamics shape human tissue donation for research and for human health. Drawing on research investigating the donation of different types of bodily tissues including blood, plasma, breastmilk, cord blood, foetal tissue and placentae we consider how and why women and men are viewed as different kinds of donors. We situate these donation practices within a broader understanding of gender difference to explain why any sociology of donation needs to take account of gender. In so doing we explore how tissue derived from the bodies of women acquires value in distinctive ways and for distinctive purposes and reasons. Within these gendered bioeconomies of donation, the supply and demand for tissue is structured by social understandings of maternity, parental responsibility, and risk, which in turn affect the experiences of donors.

Indexed as

Sociology, MedicalBiomedical ResearchBlood DonorsFemaleFetal BloodFetusHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansMaleMilk, HumanPlacentaPregnancySex FactorsTissue Donorsabortionbiobanksblood donationbreastfeedinggenderplacentapregnancy

Identifiers

PMID30105865
PMCPMC6446825

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.