ReviewLearning & behavior2018
Inequity aversion in dogs: a review.
Review in Learning & behavior, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.
- No evidence for inequity aversion in non-human animals: a meta-analysis of accept/reject paradigms.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2024Pooled it
- No Response to Inconsistently Experienced Inequity in Four Primate Species.American journal of primatology · 2026Article
- Companion animals support human wellbeing and health: evolutionary, behavioral and physiological contexts.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Review
- Bonobos respond aversively to unequal reward distributions.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2025Article
- Showing-intentional communication-in dogs (Frontiers in psychology · 2025Article
- Domestic dogs as a comparative model for social neuroscience: Advances and challenges.Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews · 2024Review
- Representation of rewards differing in their hedonic valence in the caudate nucleus correlates with the performance in a problem-solving task in dogs (Canis familiaris).Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Perceived reward attainability may underlie dogs' responses in inequity paradigms.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Bridging the Gap: Human Emotions and Animal Emotions.Affective science · 2022Article
- A comparative test of inequity aversion in domestic dogs (Canis familiaris) and dingoes (Canis dingo).PloS one · 2021Article
- No evidence for a relationship between breed cooperativeness and inequity aversion in dogs.PloS one · 2020Article
- Towards a comparative science of emotion: Affect and consciousness in humans and animals.Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews · 2020Review
- Parrots do not show inequity aversion.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Social and Non-social Mechanisms of Inequity Aversion in Non-human Animals.Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2019Article
- A Shared Food Source Is Not Necessary to Elicit Inequity Aversion in Dogs.Frontiers in psychology · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The study of inequity aversion in animals debuted with a report of the behaviour in capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella). This report generated many debates following a number of criticisms. Ultimately, however, the finding stimulated widespread interest, and multiple studies have since attempted to demonstrate inequity aversion in various other non-human animal species, with many positive results in addition to many studies in which no response to inequity was found. Domestic dogs represent an interesting case as, unlike many primates, they do not respond negatively to inequity in reward quality but do, however, respond negatively to being unrewarded in the presence of a rewarded partner. Numerous studies have been published on inequity aversion in dogs in recent years. Combining three tasks and seven peer-reviewed publications, over 140 individual dogs have been tested in inequity experiments. Consequently, dogs are one of the best studied species in this field and could offer insights into inequity aversion in other non-human animal species. In this review, we summarise and critically evaluate the current evidence for inequity aversion in dogs. Additionally, we provide a comprehensive discussion of two understudied aspects of inequity aversion, the underlying mechanisms and the ultimate function, drawing on the latest findings on these topics in dogs while also placing these developments in the context of what is known, or thought to be the case, in other non-human animal species. Finally, we highlight gaps in our understanding of inequity aversion in dogs and thereby identify potential avenues for future research in this area.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.