ReviewCurrent infectious disease reports2018
The Effect of Spray Cryotherapy on Microbial Biofilms in Chronic Rhinosinusitis.
Review in Current infectious disease reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Safety and efficacy of cryotherapy on chronic rhinitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2024Pooled it
- Host-microbe interactions in chronic rhinosinusitis biofilms and models for investigation.Biofilm · 2023Review
- The Impact of Spray Cryotherapy on Lesion-Induced Osteitis in a New Murine Experimental Model.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2023Article
- Maxillary Antrostomy Patency Following Intraoperative Use of Spray Cryotherapy.Journal of clinical medicine · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewMicrobial biofilms seem to play an active role in the pathogenesis of chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS). They represent an adaptive defense resource enabling resistance to antibiotics and host defense mechanisms. Biofilms are thought to be accountable for refractory cases of sinusitis by perpetuating local inflammation. The objective of this study was to assess the effectiveness of spray cryotherapy as a biofilm disruption agent in CRS in an in vitro model. RECENT
findingsA total of 23 patients with CRS undergoing endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) were included. Rhinosinusal mucosa samples were harvested. Half of sample was left intact while the other half was treated with spray cryotherapy, so patients served as their own witnesses. Subsequently, they were processed to hematoxylin-eosin (HE) and toluidine blue (TB) staining and analyzed by light microscopy. Biofilms were detected in 17 of 23 patients with CRS. Staining by HE showed strong correlation with the results of TB staining protocol. The in vitro CRS study demonstrated that spray cryotherapy removed polymicrobial biofilms from the mucosa surface in 70.6% of cases and induced important structural changes in the remaining samples. Thus far, cryotherapy has proven to be a reliable method for the disruption of microbial biofilms in CRS with nasal polyps, in vitro conditions. Spray cryotherapy could be a considerable benefit in the management of recalcitrant CRS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.