ReviewCurrent urology reports2018
Contemporary Management of the Newly Diagnosed Prostate Cancer Patient with Metastatic Disease at Presentation.
Review in Current urology reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Increased expression of CELSR3 indicates a poor prognostic factor for Prostate Cancer.Journal of Cancer · 2021Article
- Optimizing outcomes for patients with metastatic prostate cancer: insights from South East Asia Expert Panel.Therapeutic advances in medical oncology · 2021Review
- Timing of androgen deprivation monotherapy and combined treatments in castration-sensitive and castration-resistant prostate cancer: a narrative review.World journal of urology · 2020Review
- Corticosteroid switch in heavily pre-treated castration-resistant prostate cancer patients progressed on abiraterone acetate plus prednisone.Investigational new drugs · 2018Article
- Abiraterone acetate for early stage metastatic prostate cancer: patient selection and special considerations.Therapeutics and clinical risk management · 2018Review
- Feasibility of Dose Escalating [Advances in radiation oncologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewAndrogen deprivation therapy (ADT) has been the standard-of-care (SOC) for metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) since the middle of the twentieth century. Recently, several practice-changing trials have added new therapy options for these patients. Here we review these studies and discuss guidelines on treatment decision-making. RECENT
findingsA trio of studies (GETUG-AFU15, STAMPEDE, CHAARTED) combining docetaxel chemotherapy with ADT all showed clinical benefit of the addition. More recently, the LATITUDE and STAMPEDE-Abiraterone studies established yet another new option for up-front treatment of newly diagnosed metastatic prostate cancer, showing significantly prolonged overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) compared to ADT alone in men with high-risk mHSPC. With the recent demonstration that adding either docetaxel or abiraterone plus prednisone to ADT significantly improves survival in mHSPC, physicians are confronted by a growing body of clinical data and treatment regimens. Men with high-volume and/or high-risk metastatic disease should not be treated with ADT alone without strong consideration of docetaxel or abiraterone. The choice of a first-line therapy should be made based on risk stratification, patients' comorbidities, toxicities, quality-of-life (QOL) considerations, and cost.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.