Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30105433›Full record

ReviewInfection2018

Minimum Quality Threshold in Pre-Clinical Sepsis Studies (MQTiPSS): an international expert consensus initiative for improvement of animal modeling in sepsis.

Marcin F Osuchowski, Alfred Ayala, Soheyl Bahrami, Michael Bauer, Mihaly Boros, Jean-Marc Cavaillon, Irshad H Chaudry, Craig M Coopersmith, Clifford Deutschman, Susanne Drechsler and 21 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Infection, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Development and validation of a rabbit model ofAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2026
    Article
  3. From Glycocalyx Shedding to Microvascular Collapse in Sepsis: Endothelial Pathophysiology, Organ Dysfunction, and Mechanistic Biomarkers.Pathophysiology : the official journal of the International Society for Pathophysiology · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Experimental Sepsis Models: Advantages and Limitations.The Eurasian journal of medicine · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Transcriptomic responses from improved murine sepsis models can better mimic human surgical sepsis.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

31 authors at 20 institutions in 13 countries.

Marcin F OsuchowskiLudwig Boltzmann Institute for Experimental and Clinical Traumatology in the AUVA Research Center, Donaueschingenstrasse 13, 1200, Vienna, Austria. marcin.osuchowski@trauma.lbg.ac.at.
Alfred AyalaRhode Island Hospital and Alpert School of Medicine at Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.
Soheyl BahramiLudwig Boltzmann Institute for Experimental and Clinical Traumatology in the AUVA Research Center, Donaueschingenstrasse 13, 1200, Vienna, Austria.
Michael BauerJena University Hospital, Jena, Germany.
Mihaly BorosInstitute of Surgical Research, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary.
Jean-Marc CavaillonInstitut Pasteur, Paris, France.
Irshad H ChaudryUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham School of Medicine, Birmingham, AL, USA.
Craig M CoopersmithEmory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Clifford DeutschmanFeinstein Institute for Medical Research, Northwell Health, Manhasset, NY, USA.
Susanne DrechslerLudwig Boltzmann Institute for Experimental and Clinical Traumatology in the AUVA Research Center, Donaueschingenstrasse 13, 1200, Vienna, Austria.
Philip EfronUniversity of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Claes FrostellDivision of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Karolinska Institutet, Danderyd Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Gerhard FritschAUVA Traumacenter, Vienna, Austria.
Waldemar GozdzikWroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland.
Judith HellmanSchool of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Markus Huber-LangInstitute of Clinical and Experimental Trauma-Immunology, University Hospital of Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
Shigeaki InoueKobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan.
Sylvia KnappDepartment of Medicine 1, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Andrey V KozlovLudwig Boltzmann Institute for Experimental and Clinical Traumatology in the AUVA Research Center, Donaueschingenstrasse 13, 1200, Vienna, Austria.
Claude LibertCenter for Inflammation Research, VIB, Ghent, Belgium.
John C MarshallKeenan Research Centre for Biomedical Science, St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Lyle L MoldawerUniversity of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Peter RadermacherInstitute of Anaesthesiological Pathophysiology and Process Development, University Hospital of Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
Heinz RedlLudwig Boltzmann Institute for Experimental and Clinical Traumatology in the AUVA Research Center, Donaueschingenstrasse 13, 1200, Vienna, Austria.
Daniel G RemickBoston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.
Mervyn SingerBloomsbury Institute of Intensive Care Medicine, University College London, London, UK.
Christoph ThiemermannThe William Harvey Research Institute, Barts and London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
Ping WangFeinstein Institute for Medical Research, Manhasset, NY, USA.
W Joost WiersingaDivision of Infectious Diseases, and Center for Experimental and Molecular Medicine, the Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Xianzhong XiaoXiangya School of Medicine, Central South University, Chagnsha, Hunan, China.
Basilia ZingarelliDivision of Critical Care Medicine, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, College of Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for Experimental and Clinical Traumatology · ATFeinstein Institute for Medical Research · USUniversity Hospital Ulm · DEUniversity of Florida · USCentral South University · CNEmory University · USInstitut Pasteur · FRJena University Hospital · DEKarolinska Institutet · SEKobe University · JPMedical University of Vienna · ATQueen Mary University of London · GBRhode Island Hospital · USSt. Michael's Hospital · CAUniversity College London · GBUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham · USUniversity of Amsterdam · NLUniversity of California, San Francisco · USUniversity of Cincinnati · USUniversity of Szeged · HU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePre-clinical animal studies precede the majority of clinical trials. While the clinical sepsis definitions and recommended treatments are regularly updated, a systematic review of pre-clinical models of sepsis has not been done and clear modeling guidelines are lacking. To address this deficit, a Wiggers-Bernard Conference on pre-clinical sepsis modeling was held in Vienna in May, 2017. The conference goal was to identify limitations of pre-clinical sepsis models and to propose a set of guidelines, defined as the "Minimum Quality Threshold in Pre-Clinical Sepsis Studies" (MQTiPSS), to enhance translational value of these models.

methods31 experts from 13 countries participated and were divided into 6 thematic Working Groups (WG): (1) Study Design, (2) Humane modeling, (3) Infection types, (4) Organ failure/dysfunction, (5) Fluid resuscitation and (6) Antimicrobial therapy endpoints. As basis for the MQTiPSS discussions, the participants conducted a literature review of the 260 most highly cited scientific articles on sepsis models (2002-2013).

resultsOverall, the participants reached consensus on 29 points; 20 at "recommendation" (R) and 9 at "consideration" (C) strength. This Executive Summary provides a synopsis of the MQTiPSS consensus (Tables 1, 2 and 3).

conclusionsWe believe that these recommendations and considerations will serve to bring a level of standardization to pre-clinical models of sepsis and ultimately improve translation of pre-clinical findings. These guideline points are proposed as "best practices" that should be implemented for animal sepsis models. In order to encourage its wide dissemination, this article is freely accessible in Shock, Infection and Intensive Care Medicine Experimental.

Indexed as

Antimicrobial therapyExperimentFluid resuscitationGuidelinesHumane modelingInfection typesOrgan dysfunctionStudy design

Identifiers

PMID30105433
PMCPMC6182493
OpenAlexW4229635174

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.