Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30105411›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2019

Diagnosis of transition zone prostate cancer using T2-weighted (T2W) MRI: comparison of subjective features and quantitative shape analysis.

Satheesh Krishna, Nicola Schieda, Matthew Df McInnes, Trevor A Flood, Rebecca E Thornhill

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Quantitative Prostate MRI, From theAJR. American journal of roentgenology · 2025
    Review
  5. Superiority ofAnnals of nuclear medicine · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Satheesh KrishnaDepartment of Medical Imaging, The Ottawa Hospital, The University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Nicola SchiedaThe Ottawa Hospital, The University of Ottawa, 1053 Carling Avenue, Ottawa, Ontario, K1Y 4E9, Canada. nschieda@toh.on.ca.
Matthew Df McInnesDepartment of Medical Imaging, The Ottawa Hospital, The University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Trevor A FloodDepartment of Anatomical Pathology, The Ottawa Hospital, The University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Rebecca E ThornhillDepartment of Medical Imaging, The Ottawa Hospital, The University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo assess T2-weighted (T2W) MRI to differentiate transition zone (TZ) prostate cancer (PCa) from benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). MATERIALS AND

methodsWith IRB approval, 22 consecutive TZ PCa were retrospectively compared with 30 consecutive BPH (15 stromal, 15 glandular) nodules diagnosed using radical prostatectomy MRI maps. Two blinded radiologists (R1/R2) subjectively assessed the shape (round/oval vs. lenticular) and margin (circumscribed vs. blurred/indistinct) and for a T2W hypointense rim. Both radiologists segmented lesions extracting quantitative shape features (circularity, convexity and topology/skeletal branching). Statistical tests were performed using chi-square (subjective features), Mann-Whitney U (quantitative features), Cohen's kappa/Bland-Altman and receiver-operator characteristic analysis.

resultsThere were differences in the subjective analysis of the shape, margin and absence of a T2W-rim comparing TZ PCa with BPH (p < 0.0001) with moderate to almost perfect agreement [kappa = 0.56 (shape), 0.72 (margin), 0.97 (T2W-rim)]. Area under the curve (AUC ± standard error) for diagnosis of TZ PCas was shape = 0.88 ± 0.05, margin = 0.89 ± 0.04, and T2W-rim = 0.91 ± 0.04. Shape, judged subjectively, was specific (100%/94% R1/R2) with low-to-moderate sensitivity (55%/88% R1/R2). Circularity and convexity differed between groups (p < 0.001) with no difference in topology/skeletal branches (p = 0.31). Agreement in measurements was substantial for significant quantitative variables and AUC ± SE, sensitivity and specificity for diagnosis of TZ PCa were: circularity = 0.98 ± 0.01, 90%/96%; convexity = 0.85 ± 0.06, 68%/97%. AUCs for circularity were higher than for subjective analysis (p = 0.01 and 0.26).

conclusionSubjective analysis of T2W-MRI accurately diagnoses TZ PCa with high accuracy also demonstrated for quantitative shape analysis, which may be useful for future radiogenomic analysis of transition zone tumors. KEY POINTS: • Presence of a complete T2-weighted hypointense circumscribed rim accurately diagnoses BPH. • Round shape accurately diagnoses BPH and can be assessed quantitatively using circularity. • Lenticular shape accurately diagnoses TZ PCa and can be assessed quantitatively using convexity.

Indexed as

Margins of ExcisionAgedArea Under CurveHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedPreoperative PeriodProstatectomyProstatic NeoplasmsRetrospective StudiesROC CurveBenign prostatic hyperplasiaMagnetic resonance imagingMedical imagingProstateProstate cancer

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.