Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30105385›Full record

ArticleJournal of vision2018

Spatial summation in the human fovea: Do normal optical aberrations and fixational eye movements have an effect?

William S Tuten, Robert F Cooper, Pavan Tiruveedhula, Alfredo Dubra, Austin Roorda, Nicolas P Cottaris, David H Brainard, Jessica I W Morgan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of vision, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Color, Pattern, and the Retinal Cone Mosaic.Current opinion in behavioral sciences · 2019
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Foveal Crowding Resolved.Scientific reports · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

William S TutenDepartment of Psychology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Robert F CooperDepartment of Psychology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Pavan TiruveedhulaSchool of Optometry and Vision Science Graduate Group, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA.
Alfredo DubraDepartment of Ophthalmology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Austin RoordaSchool of Optometry and Vision Science Graduate Group, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA.
Nicolas P CottarisDepartment of Psychology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
David H BrainardDepartment of Psychology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Jessica I W MorganScheie Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

Funding

Scientific TransparencyP30EY001583 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Geoffrey Karl Aguirre · 1985 to 2026
$19.5M
Advanced Technology to Study Visual Function on a Cellular ScaleR01EY023591 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI DUNCAN, JACQUE LYNNE, ROORDA, AUSTIN · 2014 to 2023
$11.2M
Platform Technologies for Microscopic Retinal Imaging: Development & TranslationU01EY025477 · NEI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI DUBRA, ALFREDO · 2015 to 2019
$4.4M
NEI NIH HHS P30 EY001583NEI NIH HHS R01 EY023591NEI NIH HHS U01 EY025477
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Psychophysical inferences about the neural mechanisms supporting spatial vision can be undermined by uncertainties introduced by optical aberrations and fixational eye movements, particularly in fovea where the neuronal grain of the visual system is fine. We examined the effect of these preneural factors on photopic spatial summation in the human fovea using a custom adaptive optics scanning light ophthalmoscope that provided control over optical aberrations and retinal stimulus motion. Consistent with previous results, Ricco's area of complete summation encompassed multiple photoreceptors when measured with ordinary amounts of ocular aberrations and retinal stimulus motion. When both factors were minimized experimentally, summation areas were essentially unchanged, suggesting that foveal spatial summation is limited by postreceptoral neural pooling. We compared our behavioral data to predictions generated with a physiologically-inspired front-end model of the visual system, and were able to capture the shape of the summation curves obtained with and without pre-retinal factors using a single postreceptoral summing filter of fixed spatial extent. Given our data and modeling, neurons in the magnocellular visual pathway, such as parasol ganglion cells, provide a candidate neural correlate of Ricco's area in the central fovea.

Indexed as

AdultEye MovementsFemaleFixation, OcularFovea CentralisHumansMaleMiddle AgedPsychophysicsSensory ThresholdsSpatial ProcessingVisual Pathways

Identifiers

PMID30105385
PMCPMC6091889

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.