Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30105235›Full record

ReviewAnnals of translational medicine2018

Precision oncology in liver cancer.

Kevin M Sullivan, Heidi L Kenerson, Venu G Pillarisetty, Kimberly J Riehle, Raymond S Yeung

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of translational medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. A framework for fibrolamellar carcinoma research and clinical trials.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2022
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Precision surgery for primary liver cancer.Cancer biology & medicine · 2019
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Iron Metabolism in Liver Cancer Stem Cells.Frontiers in oncology · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kevin M SullivanNorthwest Liver Research Program, Department of Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Heidi L KenersonNorthwest Liver Research Program, Department of Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Venu G PillarisettyNorthwest Liver Research Program, Department of Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Kimberly J RiehleNorthwest Liver Research Program, Department of Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Raymond S YeungNorthwest Liver Research Program, Department of Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
University of Washington · US

Funding

Translational Bioimaging Core Shared ResourceP30CA015704 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI Marian Esvelt · 1985 to 2026
$296.4M
Neurotensin in Fibrolamellar Liver CancerR21CA201867 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI RIEHLE, KIMBERLY J · 2016 to 2017
$370k
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA015704NCI NIH HHS R21 CA201867
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the widespread adoption of molecular profiling in clinical oncology practice, many physicians are faced with making therapeutic decisions based upon isolated genomic alterations. For example, epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are effective in EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLC) while anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies are ineffective in Ras-mutant colorectal cancers. The matching of mutations with drugs aimed at their respective gene products represents the current state of "precision" oncology. Despite the great expectations of this approach, only a fraction of cancers responds to 'targeted' interventions, and many early responders will ultimately develop resistance to these agents. The underwhelming success of mutation-driven therapies across all cancer types is not due to an inability to detect genetic changes in tumors; rather a deficit in functional insight into the genomic alterations that give rise to each cancer. The Achilles heel of precision oncology thus remains the lack of a robust functional understanding of an individual cancer genome that then allows prediction of the best therapy and resultant outcome for that patient. Current practice focuses on one 'actionable' mutation at a time, while solid cancers typically possess many mutations that involve different cellular sub-populations within a tumor. No method or platform currently exists to guide the interpretation of these complex data, nor to accurately predict response to treatment. This problem is particularly germane to primary liver cancers (PLC), for which only a handful of targeted therapies have been introduced. Here, we will review strategies aimed at overcoming some of these challenges in precision oncology, using liver cancer as an example.

Indexed as

fibrolamellar cancerHepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)immunotherapyintrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC)kinase inhibitorsmolecular profileorganotypic culture

Identifiers

PMID30105235
PMCPMC6068329
OpenAlexW2811254165

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.