Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30105187›Full record

Article3 Biotech2018

Assessment of the effects of metal oxide nanoparticles on the growth, physiology and metabolic responses in in vitro grown eggplant (

Venkidasamy Baskar, Safia Nayeem, Sree Preethy Kuppuraj, Thiruvengadam Muthu, Sathishkumar Ramalingam

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in 3 Biotech, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 81 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Effect of zinc oxide nanoparticles synthesized fromFrontiers in plant science · 2023
    Article
  10. A review on transcriptomic and metabolomic responses of plants to nanopollution.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2022
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Venkidasamy Baskar *1Plant Genetic Engineering Laboratory, Department of Biotechnology, Bharathiar University, Marudhamalai Road, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu 641 046 India.
Safia Nayeem *1Plant Genetic Engineering Laboratory, Department of Biotechnology, Bharathiar University, Marudhamalai Road, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu 641 046 India.
Sree Preethy Kuppuraj1Plant Genetic Engineering Laboratory, Department of Biotechnology, Bharathiar University, Marudhamalai Road, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu 641 046 India.
Thiruvengadam Muthu2Department of Applied Bioscience, College of Life and Environmental Sciences, Konkuk University, Seoul, 143 701 Republic of Korea.
Sathishkumar Ramalingam1Plant Genetic Engineering Laboratory, Department of Biotechnology, Bharathiar University, Marudhamalai Road, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu 641 046 India.ORCID 0000-0002-3888-7079
Bharathiar University · INKonkuk University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nanoparticles (NPs) are widely used in various domestic products and their usage is constantly increasing which in turn can raise several environmental health issues. Like other abiotic stresses, nanomaterials also affect the growth of crop plants.

Indexed as

AnthocyaninEggplantFlavonoidsMalondialdehydeNanoparticlesPhenolicsReactive oxygen species

Identifiers

PMID30105187
PMCPMC6081843
OpenAlexW2885602329

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.