Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30105157›Full record

ArticleNeurology. Clinical practice2018

Ask a neurologist: What primary care providers ask, and reducing referrals through eConsults.

Ana C Bradi, Lucian Sitwell, Clare Liddy, Amir Afkham, Erin Keely

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurology. Clinical practice, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Telemedicine in neurology: advances and possibilities.Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria · 2022
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Headache in the neurology clinic: a 2-year audit.Irish journal of medical science · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Curbside consults join the telemedicine era.Neurology. Clinical practice · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Ana C BradiDivisions of Neurology (ACB, LS) and Endocrinology/Metabolism (EK), The Ottawa Hospital; Departments of Medicine (LS, EK) and Family Medicine (CL), University of Ottawa; C.T. Lamont Primary Health Care Research Centre (CL), Bruyère Research Institute; and The Champlain Local Health Integration Network (AA), Ottawa, Canada.
Lucian SitwellDivisions of Neurology (ACB, LS) and Endocrinology/Metabolism (EK), The Ottawa Hospital; Departments of Medicine (LS, EK) and Family Medicine (CL), University of Ottawa; C.T. Lamont Primary Health Care Research Centre (CL), Bruyère Research Institute; and The Champlain Local Health Integration Network (AA), Ottawa, Canada.
Clare LiddyDivisions of Neurology (ACB, LS) and Endocrinology/Metabolism (EK), The Ottawa Hospital; Departments of Medicine (LS, EK) and Family Medicine (CL), University of Ottawa; C.T. Lamont Primary Health Care Research Centre (CL), Bruyère Research Institute; and The Champlain Local Health Integration Network (AA), Ottawa, Canada.
Amir AfkhamDivisions of Neurology (ACB, LS) and Endocrinology/Metabolism (EK), The Ottawa Hospital; Departments of Medicine (LS, EK) and Family Medicine (CL), University of Ottawa; C.T. Lamont Primary Health Care Research Centre (CL), Bruyère Research Institute; and The Champlain Local Health Integration Network (AA), Ottawa, Canada.
Erin KeelyDivisions of Neurology (ACB, LS) and Endocrinology/Metabolism (EK), The Ottawa Hospital; Departments of Medicine (LS, EK) and Family Medicine (CL), University of Ottawa; C.T. Lamont Primary Health Care Research Centre (CL), Bruyère Research Institute; and The Champlain Local Health Integration Network (AA), Ottawa, Canada.
University of Ottawa · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAccess to neurology consultation is limited by high demand and urgency of the presentation. Champlain BASE

methodsThis is a retrospective review of 387 consecutive questions submitted to the Champlain BASE

resultsThe top 5 topics were headache (17%), incidental imaging findings (11%), numbness/tingling (11%), seizure (9%), and cerebrovascular disease (CVD) (9%). Fifty-one percent were related to diagnosis (choice of test, imaging interpretation, symptom interpretation), 23% to drug treatment (choice, adverse effects, prescribing instructions), and 17% to management (general, need for referral). Eighty-eight percent of questions took less than 10 minutes of specialist time to answer, and 80% were answered within 1 day. eConsults decreased face-to-face referrals by 50%. In 54% of cases, the PCP received information for a new course of action.

conclusionsWe found that an eConsult service provides timely access to neurologists and can divert half of intended face-to-face consultations. The most common questions posed by PCPs regarded diagnosis and drug therapy for headaches, seizures, altered sensation, and CVD. eConsult services could provide guidance for continuing medical education planning in neurology.

Identifiers

PMID30105157
PMCPMC6075973
OpenAlexW2799330378

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.