Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30105089›Full record

ReviewComputational and structural biotechnology journal2018

Mechanical and Systems Biology of Cancer.

Fabian Spill, Chris Bakal, Michael Mak

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Computational and structural biotechnology journal, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. A primer to traction force microscopy.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2022
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Volumetric compression develops noise-driven single-cell heterogeneity.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Factor XIII and Fibrin Clot Properties in Acute Venous Thromboembolism.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Organoids as ComplexCellular and molecular bioengineering · 2020
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Hydroethanolic Extract ofOxidative medicine and cellular longevity · 2020
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Fabian SpillSchool of Mathematics, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK.
Chris BakalDivision of Cancer Biology, Chester Beatty Laboratories, The Institute of Cancer Research, London SW3 6JB, UK.
Michael MakDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Yale University, New Haven, USA.
Institute of Cancer Research · GBUniversity of Birmingham · GBYale University · US

Funding

Cancer Research UK 20146
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mechanics and biochemical signaling are both often deregulated in cancer, leading toincreased cell invasiveness, proliferation, and survival. The dynamics and interactions of cytoskeletal components control basic mechanical properties, such as cell tension, stiffness, and engagement with the extracellular environment, which can lead to extracellular matrix remodeling. Intracellular mechanics can alter signaling and transcription factors, impacting cell decision making. Additionally, signaling from soluble and mechanical factors in the extracellular environment, such as substrate stiffness and ligand density, can modulate cytoskeletal dynamics. Computational models closely integrated with experimental support, incorporating cancer-specific parameters, can provide quantitative assessments and serve as predictive tools toward dissecting the feedback between signaling and mechanics and across multiple scales and domains in tumor progression.

Indexed as

CancerComputational modellingCytoskeletonFocal adhesionsMathematical biologyMechanobiologyMechanotransductionSignaling

Identifiers

PMID30105089
PMCPMC6077126
OpenAlexW2884258243

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.