Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30105028›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in immunology2018

Innate Immunity of Neonates and Infants.

Jack C Yu, Hesam Khodadadi, Aneeq Malik, Brea Davidson, Évila da Silva Lopes Salles, Jatinder Bhatia, Vanessa L Hale, Babak Baban

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 153 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
153citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

153 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Observational
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. The HIV Reservoir and Immune Landscape Across the Life Course of Women: Implications for Cure Strategies.American journal of reproductive immunology (New York, N.Y. : 1989) · 2026
    Review
  10. Immune development in early life.Nature immunology · 2026
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Bioactives in Food-As-Medicine for Special Medical Purposes.Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.) · 2025
    Review

93 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jack C YuChildren's Hospital of Georgia, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta University, Augusta, GA, United States.
Hesam KhodadadiDepartment of Oral Biology, College of Dental Medicine, Augusta University, Augusta, GA, United States.
Aneeq MalikDepartment of Oral Biology, College of Dental Medicine, Augusta University, Augusta, GA, United States.
Brea DavidsonChildren's Hospital of Georgia, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta University, Augusta, GA, United States.
Évila da Silva Lopes SallesDepartment of Oral Biology, College of Dental Medicine, Augusta University, Augusta, GA, United States.
Jatinder BhatiaChildren's Hospital of Georgia, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta University, Augusta, GA, United States.
Vanessa L HaleCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States.
Babak BabanDepartment of Oral Biology, College of Dental Medicine, Augusta University, Augusta, GA, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many important events occur at birth. The fetus is suddenly removed from a protected intra-uterine environment that is aquatic, warm, and nearly sterile, to the dry, cold external world laden with microbes. To survive, the neonate must interact with many organisms, making use of some, while vigorously defending against the others like a nation conducting trade with friendly countries and guarding against hostile ones from invading it, waging wars if necessary. Although, the neonatal immune system is plastic, however, it is highly tolerant which is due to both the fetal development during gestation as well as significant sudden changes in fetal environment and enormous exposure to the new antigens and intestinal bacteria and their products. This "quiescent mode" of innate immune system is part of a highly regulated process to fulfill all requirements of multi-layered process of early life, implemented effectively through the cells of innate immune system. While, most of the neonatal innate immune cells (e.g., neutrophils and monocytes) present contained activity and lower frequencies compared to their adult counterparts, innate lymphoid cells (ILCs), a distinct cellular component of innate immunity, show higher level of activity and presence during period of infancy compared to later stages of life and adulthood, which may suggest a role for ILCs in variable susceptibility to certain conditions during life time. In this review, while we focus on the characteristics and status of ILCs in neonatal immune system, we also draw an analogy from a national defense perspective because of the great similarities between that and the immune system by providing the known biological counterparts of all five core operational elements, the five Ds of defense, detection, discrimination, deployment, destruction, and de-escalation, with special focus on innate immunity, maternal support, and influence during the neonatal and infancy periods.

Indexed as

Immune System PhenomenaImmunity, InnateAdaptive ImmunityAnimalsCytokinesDisease SusceptibilityGastrointestinal MicrobiomeHost-Pathogen InteractionsHumansImmune SystemInfantInfant, NewbornLymphocytesMilk, HumanCytokinesinnate immunityinnate lymphoid cellmicrobiomemilkneonate immunity

Identifiers

PMID30105028
PMCPMC6077196

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.