Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30104939›Full record

ArticleThe Iowa orthopaedic journal2018

Crossed K-Wires Versus Intramedullary Headless Screw Fixation of Unstable Metacarpal Neck Fractures: A Biomechanical Study.

Bryan G Beutel, Omri Ayalon, Oran D Kennedy, Matin Lendhey, John T Capo, Eitan Melamed

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Iowa orthopaedic journal, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Bryan G BeutelThe Hand Surgery Center, Mount Sinai Beth Israel, New York, NY.
Omri AyalonDivision of Hand Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York, NY.
Oran D KennedyRoyal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland.
Matin LendheyMusculoskeletal Research Center, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York, NY.
John T CapoDepartment of Orthopaedics, Jersey City Medical Center, Jersey City, NJ.
Eitan MelamedDivision of Hand Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York, NY.
New York University Langone Orthopedic Hospital · USJersey City Medical Center · USMount Sinai Beth Israel · USRoyal College of Surgeons in Ireland · IE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Intramedullary headless screw (IMHS) has shown promise as an alternative to other fixation devices for metacarpal neck fractures. The purpose of this study was to assess the biomechanical performance of IMHS versus the commonly-used crossed K-wire technique. We hypothesized that IMHS fixation provides superior stability to K-wires. Methods: A metacarpal neck fracture model in 23 human cadaveric metacarpals was created. The specimens were divided into two groups based upon fixation method: Group 1, 3 mm intramedullary headless screw; and Group 2, 0.045 inch crossed K-wires. A cantilever bending model was used to assess load-to-failure (LTF), maximum displacement, energy absorption, and stiffness. Results: The mean LTF was 70.6 ± 30.1 N for IMHS and 97.5 ± 34.7 N for crossed K-wires. Mean stiffness was 11.3 ± 3.4 N/mm and 17.7 ± 7.8 N/mm for IMHS and crossed K-wires, respectively. The mean maximum displacement was 20.2 ± 4.6 mm for IMHS and 24.1 ± 3.7 mm for crossed K-wires. Moreover, mean energy absorption was 778.3 ± 528.9 Nmm and 1095.9 ± 454.4 Nmm, respectively, for IMHS and crossed K-wires. Crossed K-wires demonstrated significantly higher stiffness and maximum displacement than IMHS (p < 0.05). Conclusions: IMHS fixation of unstable metacarpal neck fractures offers less stability compared to crossed K-wires when loaded in bending. Clinical Relevance: Crossed K-wires offer superior stability for the treatment of metacarpal neck fractures. These results reveal that IMHS fixation is less favorable biomechanically and should be cautiously selected with regards to fracture stability.

Indexed as

Bone ScrewsBone WiresBiomechanical PhenomenaFracture Fixation, InternalFractures, BoneHumansMetacarpal BonesRange of Motion, ArticularBiomechanicalfractureintramedullarymetacarpal neck

Identifiers

PMID30104939
PMCPMC6047383
OpenAlexW2896634671

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.