Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30104716›Full record

ArticleNature communications2018

Iridophores as a source of robustness in zebrafish stripes and variability in Danio patterns.

Alexandria Volkening, Björn Sandstede

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Studies of Turing pattern formation in zebrafish skin.Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences · 2021
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Alexandria VolkeningDivision of Applied Mathematics, Brown University, 182 George Street, Providence, RI, 02912, USA. volkening.2@mbi.osu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3401-5094
Björn SandstedeDivision of Applied Mathematics, Brown University, 182 George Street, Providence, RI, 02912, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5432-1235

Funding

National Science Foundation (NSF) DGE-0228243National Science Foundation (NSF) DMS-0907904National Science Foundation (NSF) DMS-1148284National Science Foundation (NSF) DMS-1409742National Science Foundation (NSF) DMS-1440386
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Zebrafish (Danio rerio) feature black and yellow stripes, while related Danios display different patterns. All these patterns form due to the interactions of pigment cells, which self-organize on the fish skin. Until recently, research focused on two cell types (melanophores and xanthophores), but newer work has uncovered the leading role of a third type, iridophores: by carefully orchestrated transitions in form, iridophores instruct the other cells, but little is known about what drives their form changes. Here we address this question from a mathematical perspective: we develop a model (based on known interactions between the original two cell types) that allows us to assess potential iridophore behavior. We identify a set of mechanisms governing iridophore form that is consistent across a range of empirical data. Our model also suggests that the complex cues iridophores receive may act as a key source of redundancy, enabling both robust patterning and variability within Danio.

Indexed as

PigmentationAnimalsChromatophoresComputer SimulationModels, BiologicalZebrafish

Identifiers

PMID30104716
PMCPMC6089994

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.