Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30104576›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2018

Iterative and discrete reconstruction in the evaluation of the rabbit model of osteoarthritis.

Juuso H Ketola, Sakari S Karhula, Mikko A J Finnilä, Rami K Korhonen, Walter Herzog, Samuli Siltanen, Miika T Nieminen, Simo Saarakkala

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Juuso H KetolaResearch Unit of Medical Imaging, Physics and Technology, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland. juuso.ketola@oulu.fi.
Sakari S KarhulaResearch Unit of Medical Imaging, Physics and Technology, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.
Mikko A J FinniläResearch Unit of Medical Imaging, Physics and Technology, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-3348-5759
Rami K KorhonenDepartment of Applied Physics, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.
Walter HerzogHuman Performance Laboratory, Faculty of Kinesiology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Samuli SiltanenDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Miika T NieminenResearch Unit of Medical Imaging, Physics and Technology, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.
Simo SaarakkalaResearch Unit of Medical Imaging, Physics and Technology, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.

Funding

CIHR FDN-143341European Research Council 336267
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Micro-computed tomography (µCT) is a standard method for bone morphometric evaluation. However, the scan time can be long and the radiation dose during the scan may have adverse effects on test subjects, therefore both of them should be minimized. This could be achieved by applying iterative reconstruction (IR) on sparse projection data, as IR is capable of producing reconstructions of sufficient image quality with less projection data than the traditional algorithm requires. In this work, the performance of three IR algorithms was assessed for quantitative bone imaging from low-resolution data in the evaluation of the rabbit model of osteoarthritis. Subchondral bone images were reconstructed with a conjugate gradient least squares algorithm, a total variation regularization scheme, and a discrete algebraic reconstruction technique to obtain quantitative bone morphometry, and the results obtained in this manner were compared with those obtained from the reference reconstruction. Our approaches were sufficient to identify changes in bone structure in early osteoarthritis, and these changes were preserved even when minimal data were provided for the reconstruction. Thus, our results suggest that IR algorithms give reliable performance with sparse projection data, thereby recommending them for use in µCT studies where time and radiation exposure are preferably minimized.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsAnimalsAnterior Cruciate LigamentBone and BonesCartilage, ArticularDisease Models, AnimalFemaleImage Processing, Computer-AssistedKnee JointOsteoarthritisRabbitsX-Ray Microtomography

Identifiers

PMID30104576
PMCPMC6089934

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.