Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30104556›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2018

Overview of Biological, Epidemiological, and Clinical Evidence of Radiation Hormesis.

Yuta Shibamoto, Hironobu Nakamura

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
11.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 130 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. DNA repair in tumor radioresistance: insights from fruit flies genetics.Cellular oncology (Dordrecht, Netherlands) · 2024
    Review
  11. Thyroid Cancer in Regions Most Contaminated after the Chernobyl Disaster.Journal of biomedical physics & engineering · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Low-Dose Non-Targeted Effects and Mitochondrial Control.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Marine Bacteria under Low-Intensity Radioactive Exposure: Model Experiments.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yuta ShibamotoDepartment of Radiology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya 467-8601, Japan. yshiba@med.nagoya-cu.ac.jp.
Hironobu NakamuraDepartment of Radiology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka 565-0871, Japan. nakamura@saito-yukoukai-hp.jp.
Nagoya City University · JPOsaka University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The effects of low-dose radiation are being increasingly investigated in biological, epidemiological, and clinical studies. Many recent studies have indicated the beneficial effects of low doses of radiation, whereas some studies have suggested harmful effects even at low doses. This review article introduces various studies reporting both the beneficial and harmful effects of low-dose radiation, with a critique on the extent to which respective studies are reliable. Epidemiological studies are inherently associated with large biases, and it should be evaluated whether the observed differences are due to radiation or other confounding factors. On the other hand, well-controlled laboratory studies may be more appropriate to evaluate the effects of low-dose radiation. Since the number of such laboratory studies is steadily increasing, it will be concluded in the near future whether low-dose radiation is harmful or beneficial and whether the linear-no-threshold (LNT) theory is appropriate. Many recent biological studies have suggested the induction of biopositive responses such as increases in immunity and antioxidants by low-dose radiation. Based on recent as well as classical studies, the LNT theory may be out of date, and low-dose radiation may have beneficial effects depending on the conditions; otherwise, it may have no effects.

Indexed as

Radiation DosageAnimalsAntioxidantsHumansNeoplasms, Radiation-InducedNuclear WeaponsOxidoreductasesTomography, X-Ray ComputedAntioxidantsOxidoreductasesadaptive responsehormesislow-dose radiation

Identifiers

PMID30104556
PMCPMC6121451
OpenAlexW2885697233

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.