Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30104501›Full record

ArticleInsects2018

Increased Adult

Ka-Chon Ng, Luis Fernando Chaves, Kun-Hsien Tsai, Ting-Wu Chuang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Insects, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Surveillance and Control of Culex quinquefasciatus Using Autocidal Gravid Ovitraps.Journal of the American Mosquito Control Association · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Modeling the association betweenCurrent research in parasitology & vector-borne diseases · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Impact of Climate Variability and Abundance of Mosquitoes on Dengue Transmission in Central Vietnam.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ka-Chon NgCollege of Public Health, National Taiwan University, Taipei 10055, Taiwan. chonchonedwin0719@gmail.com.
Luis Fernando ChavesInstituto Costarricense de Investigación y Enseñanza en Nutrición y Salud (INCIENSA), Apartado Postal 4-2250, Tres Ríos, Cartago, Costa Rica. lfchavs@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-5301-2764
Kun-Hsien TsaiCollege of Public Health, National Taiwan University, Taipei 10055, Taiwan. kunhtsai@ntu.edu.tw.ORCID 0000-0002-6154-113X
Ting-Wu ChuangDepartment of Molecular Parasitology and Tropical Diseases, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, No. 250, Wuxing Street, Xinyi District, Taipei 11031, Taiwan. chtingwu@tmu.edu.tw.ORCID 0000-0001-8359-8172

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The assumption that vector abundance differences might drive spatial and temporal heterogeneities in vector-borne disease transmission is common, though data supporting it is scarce. Here, we present data from two common mosquito species

Indexed as

kurtosispest outbreaksSchmalhausen’s lawtime series analysisweather variability

Identifiers

PMID30104501
PMCPMC6164640

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.