Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30104418›Full record

ReviewMolecular systems biology2018

Data-independent acquisition-based SWATH-MS for quantitative proteomics: a tutorial.

Christina Ludwig, Ludovic Gillet, George Rosenberger, Sabine Amon, Ben C Collins, Ruedi Aebersold

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular systems biology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 491 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
491citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

491 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Preprocessing Large-Scale Proteomics Data.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2027
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

431 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Christina LudwigBavarian Center for Biomolecular Mass Spectrometry (BayBioMS), Technical University of Munich (TUM), Freising, Germany tina.ludwig@tum.de.ORCID 0000-0002-6131-7322
Ludovic GilletDepartment of Biology, Institute of Molecular Systems Biology, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
George RosenbergerDepartment of Biology, Institute of Molecular Systems Biology, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-1655-6789
Sabine AmonDepartment of Biology, Institute of Molecular Systems Biology, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Ben C CollinsDepartment of Biology, Institute of Molecular Systems Biology, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-0827-3495
Ruedi AebersoldDepartment of Biology, Institute of Molecular Systems Biology, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many research questions in fields such as personalized medicine, drug screens or systems biology depend on obtaining consistent and quantitatively accurate proteomics data from many samples. SWATH-MS is a specific variant of data-independent acquisition (DIA) methods and is emerging as a technology that combines deep proteome coverage capabilities with quantitative consistency and accuracy. In a SWATH-MS measurement, all ionized peptides of a given sample that fall within a specified mass range are fragmented in a systematic and unbiased fashion using rather large precursor isolation windows. To analyse SWATH-MS data, a strategy based on peptide-centric scoring has been established, which typically requires prior knowledge about the chromatographic and mass spectrometric behaviour of peptides of interest in the form of spectral libraries and peptide query parameters. This tutorial provides guidelines on how to set up and plan a SWATH-MS experiment, how to perform the mass spectrometric measurement and how to analyse SWATH-MS data using peptide-centric scoring. Furthermore, concepts on how to improve SWATH-MS data acquisition, potential trade-offs of parameter settings and alternative data analysis strategies are discussed.

Indexed as

Chromatography, LiquidTandem Mass SpectrometryPeptidesProteomeProteomicsSoftwareSystems BiologyPeptidesProteomedata‐independent acquisitionmass spectrometryquantitative proteomicsSWATH‐MSsystems biology

Identifiers

PMID30104418
PMCPMC6088389

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.