Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30104337›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2018

Influence of vmPFC on dmPFC Predicts Valence-Guided Belief Formation.

Bojana Kuzmanovic, Lionel Rigoux, Marc Tittgemeyer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Unveiling the neural underpinnings of optimism: a systematic review.Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. How mood shapes belief updating bias in depression.Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. The Anterior Insula Processes a Time-Resolved Subjective Risk Prediction Error.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Bojana KuzmanovicTranslational Neurocircuitry Group, Max Planck Institute for Metabolism Research Cologne, 50931 Cologne, Germany, and bojana.kuzmanovic@sf.mpg.de.ORCID 0000-0002-3698-7789
Lionel RigouxTranslational Neurocircuitry Group, Max Planck Institute for Metabolism Research Cologne, 50931 Cologne, Germany, and.ORCID 0000-0003-3761-8931
Marc TittgemeyerTranslational Neurocircuitry Group, Max Planck Institute for Metabolism Research Cologne, 50931 Cologne, Germany, and.ORCID 0000-0001-5072-2149

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

When updating beliefs about their future prospects, people tend to disregard bad news. By combining fMRI with computational and dynamic causal modeling, we identified neurocircuitry mechanisms underlying this optimism bias to test for valence-guided belief formation. In each trial of the fMRI task, participants (

Indexed as

CultureAdultBrain MappingDecision MakingFemaleHumansJudgmentMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMoralsMotivationPrefrontal CortexYoung Adultbelief updatecomputational modelingDCMoptimism biasvaluevmPFC

Identifiers

PMID30104337
PMCPMC6596151

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.